DCSIMG
For you to enjoy all the features of this website Belfast Newsletter requires permission to use cookies.
Find Out More
  • What is a Cookie?

  • What is a Flash Cookie?

  • Can I opt out of receiving Cookies?

  • About our Cookies

  • Cookies are small data files which are sent to your browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome etc) from a website you visit. They are stored on your electronic device.

  • This is a type of cookie which is collected by Adobe Flash media player (it is also called a Local Shared Object) - a piece of software you may already have on your electronic device to help you watch online videos and listen to podcasts.

  • Yes there are a number of options available, you can set your browser either to reject all cookies, to allow only "trusted" sites to set them, or to only accept them from the site you are currently on.

    However, please note - if you block/delete all cookies, some features of our websites, such as remembering your login details, or the site branding for your local newspaper may not function as a result.

  • The types of cookies we, our ad network and technology partners use are listed below:

    • Revenue Science

      A tool used by some of our advertisers to target adverts to you based on pages you have visited in the past. To opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

    • Google Ads

      Our sites contain advertising from Google; these use cookies to ensure you get adverts relevant to you. You can tailor the type of ads you receive by visiting here or to opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

    • Webtrends / Google Analytics

      This is used to help us identify unique visitors to our websites. This data is anonymous and we cannot use this to uniquely identify individuals and their usage of the sites.

    • Dart for Publishers

      This comes from our ad serving technology and is used to track how many times you have seen a particular ad on our sites, so that you don't just see one advert but an even spread. This information is not used by us for any other type of audience recording or monitoring.

    • ComScore

      ComScore monitor and externally verify our site traffic data for use within the advertising industry. Any data collected is anonymous statistical data and cannot be traced back to an individual.

    • Local Targeting

      Our Classified websites (Photos, Motors, Jobs and Property Today) use cookies to ensure you get the correct local newspaper branding and content when you visit them. These cookies store no personally identifiable information.

    • Grapeshot

      We use Grapeshot as a contextual targeting technology, allowing us to create custom groups of stories outside out of our usual site navigation. Grapeshot stores the categories of story you have been exposed to. Their privacy policy and opt out option can be accessed here.

    • Subscriptions Online

      Our partner for Newspaper subscriptions online stores data from the forms you complete in these to increase the usability of the site and enhance user experience.

    • Add This

      Add This provides the social networking widget found in many of our pages. This widget gives you the tools to bookmark our websites, blog, share, tweet and email our content to a friend.

    • 3rd Party Cookies

      We use Advertising agencies to provide us with some of the advertising on our websites. These include (but are not limited to) Specific Media, The Rubicon Project, AdJug, AdConion, Context Web. Please click on the provider name to visit their opt-out page.

A body blow to the DUP

I tailed off last week's column with the observation, re the then pending Dromore by-election, that "the UUP, having had a slightly shaky start to the campaign, has pulled itself together over the past couple of weeks and, for the first time in a very long time, has proved itself capable of putting enthusiastic campaigning teams on the ground."

A DUP MLA, who had been down to Dromore, assured me that the size of the UUP's campaign team was a trifling matter, which would have no relevance to the outcome; namely, that the UUP would lose the seat. But, as Sherlock Holmes noted, the observation of trifles can often lead to a correct deduction.

I have yet to hear back from that MLA, although he may well be relaxing with party colleagues in Lisbon trying to work out where it all went wrong. Admittedly, TUV performed better than I had anticipated, yet I would still urge caution when it comes to interpreting their success.

I suspect they picked up a lot of votes from DUP supporters who were simply firing a shot over their bows before giving them a second preference.

The real TUV vote – somewhere in the region of 11 per cent – is probably those who voted TUV and then transferred to the UUP.

That's still an uncomfortably large number from the DUP's perspective.

The other problem with the TUV is that I'm not entirely sure where they stand.

Jim Allister didn't resign from the DUP on the basis that he was opposed to St Andrews, the Assembly, or even power-sharing in principle with Sinn Fein. He resigned because the DUP was moving too fast and too far away from the terms of its Assembly manifesto.

He has no clear strategy for delivering the goods and no means of bending Sinn Fein to his will. In other words, and back to the mantra I directed at the DUP over the years, where is the viable and available alternative to what we have now?

Chuckle Brothers

Nevertheless, it was still a body-blow to the DUP. The Chuckle Brothers imagery has hurt them much more than they could have expected.

The sight of Ian Paisley entertaining a Taioseach in his North Antrim constituency has unsettled those who still have fond memories of him snowballing a former Taioseach.

The speed with which they concluded a deal with Sinn Fein last May, and went on to carve up office between themselves, has shocked the longstanding grassroots.

And no one in the DUP hierarchy should now underestimate the damage being done to the party by Ian Jnr.

In a column a few weeks ago I urged his dismissal and warned that his position was utterly untenable.

I am reliably informed that his name was mentioned "on too many doorsteps" during the election.

The real test of the DUP's ability to face reality and accept responsibility for their mistakes will be determined by their willingness to demote and sideline Jnr in the next few days.

It was Jnr, after all, who persuaded his father to give his imprimatur to everything that has happened since the St Andrews negotiations.

Spin

I know that they will try and put a positive spin on events; yet having forced a by-election in Jeffrey Donaldson's own backyard – confident of finishing off the TUV and seeing off the UUP – they ended up with an unexpected and unprepared for defeat.

They had put a lot of effort into the election, swamping the area with hordes of the party's biggest guns and smallest bores. Even if TUV hadn't fielded a candidate, my hunch would be that the DUP vote would have fallen considerably anyway.

And I couldn't resist a chuckle of my own as I listened to their response to their defeat.

"We are not selling the benefits of devolution well enough to our people."

"Maybe we need to listen more to what our voters are telling us."

"It was a campaign of disinformation from a unionist party which has nothing better to offer the electorate."

"Remember, it was only a by-election with a typically low turnout."

My, my, having nicked most of the UUP's policies over the past few years, along with 99 per cent of their original Agreement, the DUP is now reduced to hijacking their excuses for election failure in the past.

The UUP did remarkably well. There are only two ways of judging success in an election: winning the seat, or doing much better than expected. The UUP did both.

They also saw off a challenge from Alliance, which had decided to put up a candidate (for the first time in a decade) to see if it could repeat its success at the Assembly election and take UUP votes.

The UUP had had a terrible start to the campaign. They had an unknown and untested candidate.

The media, having written the party off from the beginning, was mostly negative or, at best, indifferent.

Yes, Carol Black may have won on TUV transfers; but those transfers only made a difference because she had managed to secure almost 25 per cent of the first preferences.

And she secured those first preferences because of the efforts of the large and enthusiastic campaigning teams I mentioned last week.

While true that the UUP vote was down slightly on the 2005 local council results, it was massively up on the Assembly vote last March: the first very clear sign, for a very long time, that the UUP may have turned the corner.

From Sir Reg Empey's point of view the result couldn't have come at a better time.

A few days after the party executive signed off on the final aspects of the Review process it has been conducting since last spring, and a few days before the implementation phase is rolled out across the party.

He couldn't have asked for a better launching pad. For the first time in years members are patting themselves on the back, prepared to believe that new electoral opportunities lie ahead.

More important, though, they now believe that the DUP juggernaut can be slowed down.

Casualties

The main casualties of all of this will be Dr Paisley and Jnr. I suspect that the son may be pushed very quickly, followed by his dad sometime in the autumn, if not earlier. T

he DUP no longer needs the Paisley name to deliver votes and the issue of succession has moved from mere whispers to open revolt.

What happens after that is anyone's guess, but one thing is certain: the stepping down of Dr Paisley will have the biggest impact on unionism since the prorogation of Stormont in March 1972.


Find It

"Business owner? - Claim your business and Advertise with us"

In association with qype logo

Looking for...

Featured advertisers

Jobs

Search for a job

Motors

Search for a car

Property

Search for a house

Weather for Belfast

Wednesday 30 May 2012

5 day forecast

Today

Light showers

Light showers

Temperature: 12 C to 20 C

Wind Speed: 9 mph

Wind direction: South

Tomorrow

Light rain

Light rain

Temperature: 11 C to 17 C

Wind Speed: 9 mph

Wind direction: West

Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.

Belfast Newsletter provides news, events and sport features from the Belfast area. For the best up to date information relating to Belfast and the surrounding areas visit us at Belfast Newsletter regularly or bookmark this page.