Unionism awaits SDLP's choice
IF there is to be a credible alternative to what is beginning to look like the prospect of a permanent Sinn Fein/unionist party axis at the heart of government (or, worse still, Sinn Fein as the largest party and three unionist parties fighting it out with each other for the post of Deputy First Minister), then it lies in the electoral recovery of the SDLP.
Because if Sinn Fein continues on its present course – which consists of nothing more subtle than threatening the collapse of the Executive if it doesn't get its own way - then the stalemate which characterises the relationship it has with the DUP will continue, irrespective of which of the unionist parties has most seats.
Peter Robinson talks of a change in the Assembly's voting system as a way of counterbalancing the Sinn Fein veto; but since such a change would require Sinn Fein's support, it isn't going to happen. Meanwhile, Jim Allister is cooking up plans to exclude Sinn Fein from the Executive Committee altogether; but Jim knows that that won't happen, either. So even if the TUV wins enough seats to play the unionist kingmaker in the next Assembly (and I reckon they could take somewhere between 12 and 16 seats) that, in itself, does not guarantee the exclusion of Sinn Fein.
And even a UUP/TUV/DUP/Conservative/PUP electoral pact which could, possibly, add an extra six seats to the unionist tally, wouldn't solve the problem. Because if Sinn Fein retained its status as the larger of the nationalist parties, and held on to the post of Deputy First Minister and the mutual veto, then it still has the power to stymie everything it doesn't like.
So the only way around the problem is for the SDLP to start winning back votes and seats and re-emerging as the majority voice of nationalism again: which is why the choice of successor to Mark Durkan is of vital importance to unionism. That said, the relationship between the SDLP and unionism hasn't been great over the years; and from my perspective John Hume was the key factor in the failure of the UUP (in particular) and the SDLP to reach consensus at a much earlier stage.
He had no understanding of what made unionism tick and he didn't actually care, either. All that mattered to him was his precious "agreed Ireland", with his definition of agreed being that the British, Irish, American and EU governments have agreed that Ireland should be united as quickly as possible and that all initiatives and processes should be predicated on that assumption.
He preferred helping and rehabilitating Sinn Fein, and encouraging a pan-nationalist philosophy, rather than building a unionist/nationalist structure which might have given Jim Molyneaux the confidence and courage to coax his party into a post-Sunningdale agreement in the early 1980s. And, of course, he was the architect of the Anglo-Irish Agreement, which came pretty damn close to destroying for ever any chance of a unionist/nationalist relationship. No-one will convince me that such an outcome wouldn't have been welcome to him.
Seamus Mallon didn't help matters much when he told everyone who would listen that the Belfast Agreement was "Sunningdale for slow learners". That statement was as inaccurate as it was offensive. The IRA wasn't buying into Sunningdale. The SDLP gave Faulkner no leeway on the Council of Ireland. Unionists in general, who had lost their Parliament two years earlier, weren’t ready. It took the IRA another 20-odd years before they accepted that terrorism wouldn’t win. It took Sinn Fein the same time to realise that an internal settlement was the only thing available to them. It took the Irish government decades to accept that their territorial claims had to go. And it took the SDLP 30 years to catch on that their concept of an “agreed Ireland” was dead in the water. So don’t keep on about the “slow learners”, Mr Mallon!
And in the whole time he was Deputy First Minister (having been lumbered with the role by a John Hume who had begun to realise that the SDLP had been outmanoeuvred by both Sinn Fein and the UUP) Mallon did absolutely nothing to help the UUP take sides against Sinn Fein.
Indeed, Mallon made matters much worse, because his behaviour indicated to unionists that there really wasn’t much difference between the SDLP and Sinn Fein. Okay, he wasn’t helped much by the relationship he had with David Trimble. But Mallon should never have used that as an excuse for refusing to face down Sinn Fein. Trimble had terrible relationships with just about everyone. But at least he had the courage to face down his own party and the DUP.
So in choosing between Margaret Ritchie and Alasdair McDonnell (and even if other candidates emerge, it is between these two that the battle will be fought) the SDLP must also send some sort of signal to unionism as to how they see the way ahead in terms of building relations. For when Alex Attwood attacks Sinn Fein for allowing the DUP to run rings around them, Alex is sending out the message that the SDLP would take a tougher stance than Sinn Fein. And if that is the case, then the SDLP replacing Sinn Fein as the voice of nationalism wouldn’t actually make the Assembly or Executive better than it is now.
The Belfast/St Andrews Agreements will only deliver stability and good government if, at the core of the Executive, there is clear evidence that unionism and nationalism can work together. There was pretty scant evidence of that between December 1999 and March 2007: and there is even less evidence now. The challenge for the SDLP is to prove that it has the courage to build something new and stronger with unionism, as opposed to trying to out-green Sinn Fein.
I await, with genuine interest, the agendas that Alasdair and Margaret will be setting before their colleagues. There is an opportunity now for the SDLP to meet unionism in the middle and actually make the Assembly and Executive work for the benefit of Northern Ireland.
Alex Kane is UUP director of communications
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Belfast
Monday 13 February 2012
Today
Light rain
Temperature: 4 C to 9 C
Wind Speed: 17 mph
Wind direction: North
Tomorrow
Cloudy
Temperature: 6 C to 9 C
Wind Speed: 17 mph
Wind direction: North west
