Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the News Letter site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'My life was changed by gay storm doctor'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 June 2008
A MAN who left a gay lifestyle behind and married a woman has paid tribute to the contribution of counselling by Dr Paul Miller.
Northern Ireland psychiatrist Dr Miller, an advisor to the DUP's Iris Robinson, has been variously slammed and praised across the airwaves in recent days after the Strangford MP praised his work in helping people who have unwanted same-sex attraction.

Praise

Forty-year-old James Parker, who lives in London, praised the work of Dr Miller and said he thought everyone who wishes to avail of his services should have the freedom to do so.

"I have had several sessions with Dr Miller in my journey," said Mr Parker. "I came out as a young gay man at 17 in London without any hostility from anyone and was very active in the gay lifestyle.

"Later on I met my dream partner and seemed to settle down. However, I began to realise that this man and I were looking for something in each other that neither of us could provide: to be affirmed in our own gender as men.

"My friendships and life were 100 per cent in the gay community, but while at university I became fascinated with another young man who took a genuine interest in me as a person.

Accept

"He was able to hold my gaze and my eyes, to smile and put his arm around me. I was drawn towards him and his friends. It was the first time I had been accepted very much as a gay man.

"I learnt it was possible to have friendships which were non-sexual. It turned out this group were Christians with a deep spirituality.

"They were scratching the very place I itched most; I never felt I took my place in the world deeply and strongly as a man - I was deeply frightened by other men doing masculine things.

"I saw this new community which was centred around other people and I noticed the community I was in was narcissistic and self-centred in comparison. I began to question my identity - was it simply my sexual orientation?

Trauma

"Through therapy I began to deal with some traumatic incidents in my past where I had been raped and sexually abused. I had found sexual abuse gave me human attention but in a perverted sort of way.

"Also, I never had a concrete relationship with my father so my mother became my place of comfort.

"I have found there are a whole range of factors that in some way stop a man becoming masculine. If they aren't dealt with by puberty these needs are suddenly eroticised.

"Straight people often say 'gay people must be born that way' because they can't understand it. But when I probe them more closely such people have always had healthy relationships with a significant male role model as they grew up."

Affirmation

He says the counselling Dr Miller offers is mainly affirming gender and healing deeper hurts in life. "Orientation is only a very secondary side issue for those who wish to explore it," said James.

As his journey continued, he began to cut his connections with the gay community and committed himself to male and female friends who knew he was still struggling with same-sex attraction.

"Both men and women, they continually affirmed me as a man," he said.

(Continued on next page)

'Homosexuals can change, but only if they want to'

YOUR VIEWS: Can counselling change homosexuals?




The full article contains 587 words and appears in News Letter newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 11 June 2008 5:58 PM
  • Source: News Letter
  • Location: Belfast
 
Prev
1
2
1

Anon8,

Belfast 11/06/2008 11:21:18
Like Iris, using my right of free speech and the Bible as my guide could someone help me out on the following?

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. Should I possess a slave from the Republic of Ireland or Wales, any thoughts?

e) I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath (he is a Church of Ireland minister). Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends
2

Anon8,

Beflast 11/06/2008 11:26:15
continued...

He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

Christians should follow all of the Bible instead of select passages which incite hatred and prejudice.
3

T. J.McClean,

Belfast 11/06/2008 13:19:50
Hey Anon8, from Belfast,
If you want to argue it from a biblical viewpoint-
Read New Testament Matthew 19 4-6 The words of our Lord Himself, are pretty clear and i think supersede all others.

4 He answered, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”

No homosexuality, no adultery and no divorce in God's perfect plan. Even the Holy Father, the Pope, has backed this, and he's spoken a lot stronger against homosexual practice than Mrs Robinson!
4

A Wheeler,

11/06/2008 15:48:32
Hey TJ, what about chips? Are we allowed chips? I know, I know; that passage isn't about condemning chips. But it isn't about condemning homosexuality, either, and yet you seem to have broadened its meaning to include that anyway. So... where do we stand on chips?

By the way, did you read the rest of that passage? the bit where Jesus says that not everyone can accept this word, and that men born or made without desire for women, or without desire for marriage, do not need to abide by this message?

You're right, the words of our Lord Himself are pretty clear and should be taken above all others in the Bible. It's always a good idea to read them through to the end, too.
5

RedRory,

Clydebank 11/06/2008 16:19:15
Gays cannot see the difference between the 'agape'
in Christ's love and 'eros', the love demonstrated in carnal sexual acts.
'Eros' will not be found in Heaven;
but 'agape' will! because this is God's love!
God's love abides forever but eros will pass away!
There is no place in agape for eros!
One cannot take the righteousness of Christ and mix with it, the carnality of man!
6

RedRory,

Clydebank 11/06/2008 16:22:16
To add to my previous comment,
I was happy to see 11 gays and 1 lesbian surrender their lives to Jesus the other night!
one of them, did so, over the internet!
Godly counsel is fruitful, because God is in it to fulfil His word!
7

RedRory,

Clydebank 11/06/2008 16:54:45
My reply to Anon8
I don't sacrifice to the Lord in any way that patronises my neighbours! What the Lord requires has priority! Besides, Christ died for the ungodly;
one sacrifice for sin! There is no longer any need for animal sacrifices which only pointed the way to Calvary!
The best thing to do with daughters and sons is to give them back to the Lord before satan destroys them.
Sex is a gift and not a right! Practised God's way; in marriage and with a faithful woman who loves the LORD, means that true love and affection overrides the mastery of and selfishness of the flesh! I love my wife very dearly still, after 25 years marriage, and there is still an immense happiness in our sexuality.
Go and make slaves of people! I prefer doing things God's way, setting people free by bringing them into a relationship with Jesus!
One point about the Laws in the OT! Fulfilling them is an impossibility; being able to obey any of them is not going to get you into a relationship with Jesus! and therefore into Heaven! Laws are given to those who
think and behave like the heathen; lawless and ungodly people! God expects His people to be different to them and His laws were really designed to reveal sin in us and have it dealt with! God's laws separate the 'unclean' from those whom He has 'cleansed' through a vital relationship with Him.
As for the Sabbath, God is at work too! on that day!
whether it be Saturday or Sunday! If God didn't work, the world would fall apart! I need God to restrain you! and He needs to do that even on Sundays! Sabbath is a day to enjoy rest! and what a glorious rest Jesus has brought me into since He called me into it 30 years ago! And the marvellous rest He has brought me into, is with me, seven days a week!
I don't have to go to church on Sundays to get to Heaven (hopefully); I go because I love the Lord and His people and I do so as often as I can, even during the week! God's family is a great family!
When I finally go to into His Glorious
8

CounterAtheist,

South Armagh 11/06/2008 19:11:58
Rather off-topic, Anon8, don't you think? As if free speech hangs on an FAQ that have been doing the rounds on the Internet for a few years now.

a) i) Where's the "smiting" mentioned? Exactly- it isn't/wasn't a capital offence! ii) bull-burning was abolished through Christ's sacrifice for the redemption of sins (Heb 10:4, et al.)
b) It says "bondsmen"/"bondsmaids", not slaves. Kidnapping is/was a capital offence (Ex 26:16, Deut 24:7), so logically slavery is not Judeo-Christian. Poor Israelites would commit themselves to serve as servants for security, not be taken as slaves.
c) "Cleanliness" has been done away with by the shedding of Christ's precious blood (Rom 14:14, Acts 10:15 etc) Even if it wasn't, that law was made for the Temple, now destroyed - Christ is the new Temple (Mt 26:61)
d) See b)
e) i) Christ, being Lord of the Sabbath (Mk 2:28), abolished it, as confirms Paul (Rom 14:5) but see what RedRory said. ii) Executing anyone requires a state/due process that will legally do it (cf. Jews taking Christ to a Roman court for a Jewish crime), as well as 2/3 good witnesses (Deut 17:6)
f) Yes, they are different Hebrew words, one worse than the other. But see the abolition of dietary laws (Acts 10:15).
g) That was for the (now abolished) Temple (see c), not any manmade church.
h) The text says "rounded" (ie with a circle, tonsuring), not cut (Ezek 44:20). Note eg. Samson was required by God to not cut his hair, as though he were an exception. Why would God tell him personally if it forbade "cut"? Not a capital offence though, just condemned.
i) No handballs in football. For dead pig see cleanliness (Acts 10:15)
j) "Cleanliness" (i, f)- mixing crops etc not unclean. Mixing fibres then was also a sign of making shoddy clothing, something now fixed by modern advances. Again, no death penalty in a state which does not allow it (e).

Any more objections?









9

Antrimlad,

Co Antrim 11/06/2008 22:15:07
This is such an interesting debate going on here.

I am a man and member of the gay community here in NI. Perhaps controversially, I do believe that Mrs Robinson has the right to say what she did. If she had directly incited hate or attacks on the gay community then there would be a massive problem with that however I personally don't believe that she did actually incite hate. She merely expressed her viewpoint in line with her beliefs however controversial that viewpoint may be. And if gay people wish to change their lifestyle then they should be allowed to pursue that route regardless of how effective or ineffective it is.

That said however, I do have some further points to make. Many of the viewpoints expressed here on the thread debate this argument within the context of the bible. Perhaps it is because many of us are brought up in Christian families we tend to be under a powerful almost subconscious influence that makes us believe that God in the Christian sense of the word, Jesus and the Bible are a fact of life. I would argue completely to the contrary. With the knowledge that we are fortunate enough to have in the world today, we no longer need to believe in such myths as Christianity, Jesus and the Bible. I personally find it quite amusing that some people still walk around today believing that the world is a few thousand years old and that it was created in seven days. To believe in the Bible and Christianity effectively means that you have to refute the existence of the dinosaurs. And it surprises me just how many christians are so uncomfortable with trying to reconcile this fact in their minds. Much of what happened in the Bible probably did happen but I am 100% sure that there is no supernatural element. Stories based on actual events were embelished by civilisations that simply had no chance of truely comprehending the world they lived in. Religions have come and gone through the ages and Christianity with its doctrines is no diffe
10

Antrimlad,

Co Antrim 11/06/2008 22:15:41
different to any of the others. Humans make religions, not Gods. And for anyone who doubts what I read here, just go and look online at the pictures from the hubble space telescope. There are billions of stars like our sun in our Galaxy the Milky Way, and in turn there are billions of galaxies. Multiply the figures out and you soon realise that planet earth is about as significant to God as a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert is to us. I'm not saying that there isnt a God or a higher force in nature, i am saying that if there is it has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity and its sometimes bigoted teachings.

So to conclude, we live in a liberal and democratic society. We dont need to censor people with controversial opinions. Most people whether they admit it to themselves or not are sensible enough to ultimately know within themselves that any supernatural element to Chrisitanity is a complete myth. The problem is the human organism's fear of death and inability to cope with grief when a relative passes away - this allows religion to hold on however desperately. To argue with people of Christian opinions in many ways legitimises in their minds what they are saying. I am confident enough in my beliefs not to feel threatened by the comments that have been made because I feel that I have a much better understanding of life than people who make comments such as those made by Mrs Robinson. Thanks for reading.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.