Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bigotry not just Rangers problem - academic



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 October 2007
A leading Belfast academic has published a blistering attack on Celtic Football Club apologists for "wrongly" portraying sectarianism as a mainly Protestant problem.
Queen's University Professor of Political History Graham Walker – who co-edited the new book It's Rangers For Me? – asks why it is that the numerous attacks by Celtic fans on Rangers players in public over the last few years have been deemed less newsworthy than attacks on Celtic players?

ABUSE
There is a clear double standard in operation for Rangers fans, he argues: "Celtic fans mouthing abuse such as 'Orange b******s' is regarded as acceptably political or 'a bit of craic' while Rangers fans supposedly deal in a repertoire of straightforward bigotry and racism."

The book has chapters written by some 20 contributors including academics, intellectuals, journalists, politicians, players and fans.
Internationally acclaimed Belfast playwright Gary Mitchell also writes a chapter, as does Ulsterman Gordon Smith.


A Scotsman and lifelong Rangers supporter, Professor Walker's book, co-edited with Ronnie Esplin, is understood to be the first serious analysis of Rangers Football Club and its place in society.

And it will undoubtedly be seen as a response to the similarly provocative Celtic Minded, two pro-Celtic FC volumes from numerous contributors, edited by Joe Bradley.


Professor Walker writes extensively about the contributors to these pro-Celtic FC volumes in the new book, arguing that they have wrongly made out that sectarianism in Scotland is a mainly Protestant problem.

STEREOTYPE
And he also challenges the authors on their stereotyping of Irish Protestants in Scotland as racist, violent and homophobic, citing examples of such behaviour as clearly existing within Irish Catholic culture.

"For many Rangers fans it is their club and the popular associations it has historically held which are increasingly marginalised and traduced in contemporary Scotland," he writes. "A sense of Scottishness which draws on Protestant religious identity is now decidedly at a discount, and anyone attempting to advertise such an identity is likely to be dismissed as a bigot."


Celtic FC apologists are still caricaturing almost extinct Protestant culture of the "Wee Frees" on television and "are quite simply not interested in the realities of Protestantism as a faith", he says. "They wish to collapse these varieties and the whole range of Protestant opinion from fundamentalist to liberal into a usable stereotype."

The Celtic Minded line of argument about Celtic fans having "to keep their heads down" on account of their "unacceptable" identity is "bewildering" he holds. "When has a support as raucous and 'in yer face' as Celtic's ever kept its head down?"


VICTIMS

Many Celtic Minded authors display both ignorance and sectarianism in their insistence that it is only Celtic fans have been the victims of Old Firm-related violence, he holds, and many of them seem unperturbed about songs and chants which celebrate IRA atrocities at Enniskillen, Teebane, Kingsmills, the Shankill Road, La Mon, and Darkley.

Writer Patricia Ferns in particular, he says, defends the IRA slogan 'Tiocfaidh ar la' ( 'Our Day Will Come' ) on the grounds that it refers to footballing success.


"So, if Rangers fans argue that the use of 'No Surrender' is simply an injunction to the team not to give up, we should expect to be taken at face value by the media and our opponents? Aye right!" he responds. Such authors make it clear the Irishness which they are most concerned to celebrate "is in fact that of the Republican armed struggle."

Any segregation between Protestants and Catholics that does exist in Scotland, he says, has largely been at the behest of the Catholic Church with its rigid stance on schooling; Celtic FC apologists are either unaware or choose to ignore the fact that half the marriages involving under 35 Catholics in Scotland are mixed.

(See next article down - Celtic FC apologists 'need to look at themselves').

Readers can order the book, Its Rangers for me, from the News Letter bookshop on 028 38 39 55 04.



The full article contains 664 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 October 2007 1:02 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Belfast
 
Prev
1
Next
1

vinniethedog,

scotland 16/10/2007 15:57:31
I find it incredible that a professor? should get so many things wrong. I have followed Celtic football club for over 30 years through our 9 in a row and through the rangers one. So I think i`m qualified to speak about the celtic support.I have never hand on heart heard Celtic fans glorify IRA bombings of the ones he speaks about it is simply not true. Why should he do this? I honestly dont know.That is not to say Celtic fans dont sing Irish rebel songs of course they do - but in all honesty 90% of them are pre troubles - Boys of the old brigade - broad black brimmer- off to Dublin - merry ploughboy- sean south-etc.Growing up in Scotland I learned at a very early age to keep my head down and mouth shut - again the professor questions this ! I can assure him its very true. I have yet to hear of a young Rangers supporter killed for wearing his colours - but it has happened the other way. I`m all for debate on the sectarian issue - but if so called professors are getting it so wrong what chance have we got?
2

ETims Team,

http://www.etims.net 16/10/2007 19:59:22
What an ill informed, daft, incoherent and laughable rant this 'book' must be. If this is a synopsis of content it's about as credible as Paisley for Pope! Complete and utter garbage. Where is the evidence for 'IRA chants glorifying Teebane, Enniskillen' etc? There is none. These chants never existed. This is completely fabricated nonsense. Paranoid and complete and utter boIIox. God help us all if this is a true reflection of what genuine Rangers fans think, as opposed to the daft numpties who take offence at the colour green so much so they ban green straws from Ibrox!!!
3

Juan Baton,

Pamplona 17/10/2007 10:38:18
If the book is entitles Rankers for me ... why dont they stick to FOOTBALL ... oh they cant ,,,,,
4

Blaken,

Glasgow 04/05/2009 10:37:17
I find it somewhat incredible that vinniethedog and ETims Team are "sticking up for" their support, although I would expect as much. There seems to be a cover-up in the media where Celtic are concerned. Why don't they just come out and say they're a Roman Catholic team, founded by RCs, for RCs? Maybe the truth would hurt. Your fans, maybe a minority, HAVE sung IRA songs at matches, even if mostly at away games. At Larne ferry terminal recently, Celtic fans were even glorifying in the murder of British soldiers at their barracks, wearing beards and carrying pizza boxes. How funny is that? On 29th May 2005, you also invited IRA-loving Patricia Ferns to "sing" at your ground and refer to Rangers as "animals", whilst having someone dressed as the Pope "bless" all four corners of your beloved stadium. I know there are many Protestants that support your club, but as one myself, I could never do it, because I only see Catholicism in abundance at your club. As for Juan Baton, it's Rangers, not Rankers. Stick to your Basque language and bull-running, mate, and don't get involved in something you don't have a clue about. ETA are every bit as bad as the IRA for murdering innocent people.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.