Declassified files: Thatcher relieved unionists didn’t bomb after Anglo-Irish accord

Margaret Thatcher and Garret Fitzgerald sign the Anglo Irish Agreement in 1985

Margaret Thatcher and Garret Fitzgerald sign the Anglo Irish Agreement in 1985

7
Have your say

Margaret Thatcher was troubled by the scale of the unionist backlash to the Anglo-Irish Agreement – but relieved that there were no bombs or mass strikes in the immediate aftermath of the accord.

Irish state papers released under the 30-year-rule show that Mrs Thatcher believed that the Anglo-Irish Agreement gave the Irish government all the glory and none of the problems.

The prime minister’s anxieties were laid bare a fortnight after the signing of the historic treaty during a head to head with taoiseach Garret FitzGerald on how to win unionist support, and fast.

In a half-hour meeting in the Kirchberg Building in Luxembourg on December 3, 1985, the Prime Minister said she was deeply upset with accusations she faced of betrayal and treachery over her handling of Northern Ireland affairs.

“I am very worried about developments. You have all the glory. We have all the problems,” she told Dr FitzGerald.

Documents released by the National Archives in Dublin show the taoiseach urged Mrs Thatcher to stick with the treaty despite the much deeper than anticipated unionist opposition.

At the same time, she pressured him to get visible evidence of beefed-up border security on the Republic’s side.

“The unionist reaction is very much more serious than I had thought,” Mrs Thatcher said.

“I have been told: you are treacherous, you have betrayed us, etc. I have got to reassure the unionists and fast.”

Mrs Thatcher told the taoiseach that unionists had to be involved in some way in the workings of the treaty after advisers warned Ian Paisley and Jim Molyneaux were only articulating the “popular feeling” on the ground.

It was one of the rare occasions when emotion can be detected in the confidential notes in State papers and in the late Tory leader’s mind.

“I am deeply upset about the betrayal charges,” she said. “The trouble is, they (unionists) will hear only what they want to hear. There is no good saying things in an English voice. Irish voices must come in and help.

“The unionists are saying that there are no visible results. I have been only too relieved that they reacted constitutionally. There have been no strikes and no bombs.”

Dr FitzGerald urged her not to be deflected by menace or threats and tried to get her to focus on the options to bring unionism on board.

His calm, methodical approach in the face of a feared breakdown in law and order is striking when set against his views on Mrs Thatcher which were recorded in other documents from his office.

When he first met her as Opposition leader in the Commons, Mr FitzGerald immediately felt he could do business with her one day.

In a meeting with the SDLP, he reflected how: “It had been clear to him that, if he could turn her”, she had the qualities necessary to do something serious about Northern Ireland.

He had made up his mind when he met her to make a major effort to have some influence over her.

Dr FitzGerald used the Luxembourg summit to raise the prospect of getting early release and remission for Maze prisoners if a few months of relative peace followed the signing of the treaty.

Mrs Thatcher totally rejected the idea, saying: “That would be dynamite - no, not dynamite, nuclear. We could not think of relief for people guilty of bombing, or murder and other atrocities.”

Back to the top of the page