DCSIMG

Ballymurphy families consider case against British Government after probe rejected

John Teggart (centre right), whose father Daniel was killed, speaking at a media conference in west Belfast.

John Teggart (centre right), whose father Daniel was killed, speaking at a media conference in west Belfast.

Families of those shot dead during a British Army operation in west Belfast are considering a legal challenge against a Government decision to reject an independent re-examination of the 1971 shootings.

Northern Ireland Secretary Theresa Villiers today ruled out their call to establish a review panel to assess the evidence related to an episode the relatives refer to as the Ballymurphy massacre, claiming it would not serve the public interest.

Ten people died after being shot by soldiers, among them a Catholic priest and a mother of eight, over three days of gunfire in August 1971. Another man died of a heart attack following an alleged violent confrontation with the troops.

Families reacted furiously to the decision, while Irish premier Taoiseach Enda Kenny expressed his disappointment.

Briege Foyle, whose mother Joan Connolly was killed, ripped up Ms Villiers’ letter informing her of the rejection at an emotional press conference in west Belfast.

“We will fight for this until we die and then our young family will come in and they will fight for it, we will get our day,” she vowed.

“Theresa Villiers is just a puppet for David Cameron. But David Cameron, we are coming - we are coming to 10 Downing Street and we are going to let you know that we are not going anywhere.”

Lawyers for the families are now considering a potential judicial review of Ms Villiers’ decision.

As with Bloody Sunday in Londonderry six months later, members of the Parachute Regiment were involved in the fatal operation in Ballymurphy.

A new inquest into the 10 deaths caused by gunfire was ordered by Northern Ireland’s Attorney General John Larkin QC in 2011.

The families have also campaigned for a review panel to be set up by the Government. They wanted the probe modelled on the one that re-examined the Hillsborough football stadium disaster.

They suggested the panel could have been chaired by former Northern Ireland police ombudsman Nuala O’Loan.

The shootings took place as the British Army moved into republican strongholds in west Belfast to arrest IRA suspects in the wake of the introduction by the Stormont administration of the controversial policy of internment without trial.

Soldiers claimed they had come under attack and returned fire. But relatives have demanded an acknowledgement that their loved ones were wrongfully killed.

Ms Villiers said the decision had been made after careful consideration.

“I have met the families who lost loved ones in Ballymurphy and I was very moved to hear their personal stories of pain and loss, and by their shared sense of determination,” she said.

“I have taken time to consider their proposal for an independent review panel, which I received last summer.

“In my view, the balance of public interest does not favour establishing an independent review. I do not believe that such a review would provide answers which are not already in the public domain or covered by existing legal processes.

“In reaching this decision, I have sought to balance the strong and clear views of the families with the need to ensure that existing legal mechanisms can continue to carry out their functions without being impeded by an additional process. That includes the ongoing coroner’s inquests.

“I would like to reiterate my deepest sympathy and condolences for the families who were bereaved in August 1971. I am aware that this decision is not the outcome the families had hoped for.

“Having met them - and other families affected by other incidents throughout the Troubles - I know that the passage of time does not ease the pain and hurt felt about the loss of loved ones.

“I am willing to meet with the Ballymurphy families and their representatives again, if they wish.”

John Teggart, whose father Daniel was one of those killed, said the Government had treated them in a “disrespectful and shameful manner”.

“The families have a message for David Cameron,” he said. “When will you stop harbouring the murderers in the ranks of the British army?

“No-one should be above the law. Are the 11 people who lay in their graves of different worth because they are Irish citizens? We families will not be deterred by this disgraceful decision, in fact we will step up our campaign, shaming your government and your hypocritical policies.

“We will not accept being treated like second-class citizens. Let’s be perfectly clear, you haven’t seen the last of the Ballymurphy families.

“It is inexcusable in a country that claims to be a democracy that there has never been an investigation into the murder of 11 innocent civilians in Ballymurphy in August 1971.”

Mr Teggart said the proposal had been “cost-effective” and was not comparable to previous lengthy public inquiries that have cost the public purse millions of pounds.

Mr Kenny, who had backed the families’ call for a review, said he was disappointed by the UK Government’s decision.

“I note the statement issued today by Secretary of State Theresa Villiers indicating that she will not appoint a Hillsborough-style panel to review the Ballymurphy cases,” he said.

“I am disappointed to learn of this decision.

“I met with the Ballymurphy families in Dublin in January as part of my series of meetings with victims and relatives affected by the Northern Ireland Troubles.

“The families explained their proposals for an independent panel review of the events that took place in Belfast in August 1971 when 11 people were killed.

“I told the families that the Government supported their case, and that I intend to visit Ballymurphy and meet with the families there during a future visit to Belfast.

“Following our meeting in January, I wrote to Prime Minister Cameron asking that the families’ request for a limited review be granted. I also raised the matter with him at our meeting in London on March 11.

“Consequently, I am disappointed with today’s news, which I know will come as a blow to the families.

“Notwithstanding this setback, I hope that it will still be possible to find a way for the families to get the truth and to vindicate fully the good names of their loved ones.”

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page