Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

RUGBY: Best appeal is dismissed



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 October 2008
Northampton and Ireland flanker Neil Best's appeal against an 18-week suspension for eye-gouging has tonight been dismissed by a Rugby Football Union panel.
The 29-year-old remains suspended until January 27, 2009.
The ban covers eight rounds of Guinness Premiership action, all of Northampton's European Challenge Cup and EDF Energy Cup pool matches plus Ireland's autumn schedule.
Best was suspended last Wednesday after admitting he had "made contact with the eye or eye area" of Wasps flanker James Haskell during Saints' 24-20 victory at Franklin's Gardens.
It was only Best's third game for the club following his summer move from Ulster.
The RFU panel accepted Best had not intentionally searched for Haskell's eye.
But they did not agree with Best's account that contact with Haskell's eye had been "fleeting" and described his actions as "grave".
Northampton decided to challenge the ban after taking legal advice but the RFU appeal panel threw out their case at a London hearing this evening.

The full article contains 169 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2008 12:59 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Belfast
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.