Jim Allister wins challenge over £20m north coast hotel

An artist's impression of the hotel
An artist's impression of the hotel
Share this article

TUV leader Jim Allister has won his legal challenge to planning permission for a new £20 million hotel and leisure resort on the north coast.

A High Court judge identified breaches in the process and held that Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council’s decision to approve the four-star complex near Portstewart was procedurally unfair.

Mr Justice McCloskey ruled: “Mr Allister was not afforded a fair and reasonable opportunity to make comprehensive, informed representations to either the Planning Committee or the other statutory agency endowed with relevant legal powers, namely the Department for Infrastructure.”

In a statement following the verdict Mr Allister said: “I greatly welcome the decision of the court, after careful scrutiny, to the challenge I brought as a private citizen against a planning decision by Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council.

“I will now consider, with my legal advisors, the next steps to be taken in this matter.”

Together with a neighbour, he sought a judicial review after the green light was given for the development close to their homes.

In March 2018 the council granted planning permission for a hotel and spa complex on the Ballyreagh Road.

The project also involves conference and banqueting facilities, holiday cottages, a restaurant and visitor attraction centre for the North West 200 motorbike races.

Nearly 100 full-time jobs, generating almost £2m in salaries, would be created, it was claimed.

With up to 50,000 guests expected annually by the third year of operation, the court heard projections they could spend around £6m per annum in the local economy.

Mr Allister’s legal contended that there was a bias towards securing planning approval at all costs.

However, the judge said: “I am left with no misgivings about the purity of the conduct and motives of the planning officials and the Planning Committee members.”

Mr Allister mounted a wide-ranging challenge to the planning permission, including claims that the environmental screening process for the proposed coastal location was flawed.