Ballymurphy families fail in bid to block UVF inquest evidence

A decision over whether to grant a loyalist paramilitary go-between special status at a high-profile Troubles inquest has been adjourned.
By The Newsroom
Published 27th Jul 2018, 16:14 BST
Updated 27th Jul 2018, 16:14 BST
Families outside Belfast Court in April at a previous preliminary hearing of an inquest into the Ballymurphy killings: Picture: Colm Lenaghan/PacemakerFamilies outside Belfast Court in April at a previous preliminary hearing of an inquest into the Ballymurphy killings: Picture: Colm Lenaghan/Pacemaker
Families outside Belfast Court in April at a previous preliminary hearing of an inquest into the Ballymurphy killings: Picture: Colm Lenaghan/Pacemaker

Presiding coroner Siobhan Keegan has given the UVF witness four weeks to provide statements and submissions about the evidence they say they have before she makes a decision.

Soldiers have long been held responsible for killing 10 people in Ballymurphy but the accepted narrative became clouded earlier this year when former UVF members came forward to claim their organisation was also involved.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Loyalists have asked an interlocutor to present evidence that a UVF sniper shot some of the victims to the coroner’s court ahead of a fresh inquest in the autumn.

At a preliminary hearing in Belfast in June, a lawyer for the go-between – known to the court at Witness X – made a formal submission urging the granting of Properly Interested Person status.

Such status would enable the interlocutor to access confidential files related to the inquest and cross-examine other witnesses due to give evidence.

The families of those killed at Ballymurphy have opposed the application.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Karen Quinlivan QC, representing several of the Ballymurphy families, told the June hearing that the bid had “absolutely no merit”.

“The application being made really is an outrageous application,” she said.

“A person who’s not a witness to anything, didn’t witness any event and wants to give multiple hearsay accounts - essentially gossip among loyalists about Ballymurphy - and try to present that as evidence.”

On Friday, Ms Keegan told a preliminary hearing at Belfast High Court that, when that evidence has been given, she will be in a better position to make a decision on whether special status would be appropriate.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She said she is grateful to Witness X for coming forward to offer what she described as information about the movements of the UVF in the area.

“Rather than dismiss the application, I will adjourn it for review at the next preliminary inquiry in August,” she told the court.

The UVF men claims one of its members was responsible for shooting some of the Ballymurphy victims from a nearby loyalist estate. It is understood the man named by the organisation is a now deceased member called Tommy West.

A Catholic priest and a mother-of-eight were among those killed during three days of gunfire involving members of the Parachute Regiment in August 1971.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Another man died of a heart attack following an alleged violent confrontation with the troops in the west Belfast estate.

The shootings took place as the Army moved in to republican strongholds to arrest IRA suspects in the wake of the introduction by the Stormont administration of the controversial policy of internment without trial.

The new inquest is due to formally open in September, with the next preliminary hearing set for August 29.

Related topics:BallymurphySoldiersBelfast