Court challenge to ‘lack of policy’ on timing of Irish unity poll

The government has unlawfully failed to put in place a policy for holding a border poll in Northern Ireland, the Court of Appeal has heard.
Raymond McCord (left) at the Court of Appeal with his solicitor Ciaran O'HareRaymond McCord (left) at the Court of Appeal with his solicitor Ciaran O'Hare
Raymond McCord (left) at the Court of Appeal with his solicitor Ciaran O'Hare

Lawyers for a victims’ campaigner claimed the current criteria for calling a referendum on the question of Irish unity lacks transparency.

Raymond McCord is challenging a ruling that it should be left to the secretary of state to make a decision on the appropriate circumstances.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

According to his legal team that has led to an unconstitutional situation where Julian Smith has simply opted to maintain the status quo.

Ronan Lavery QC argued that a policy is now required to bring legal certainty.

“My client doesn’t want a border poll, he feels that would be destabilising,” the barrister stressed.

But he set out a scenario where such a referendum would be mandatory.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“That is a matter of assessment, with empirical evidence, and whether it would be the worst thing in the world for Northern Ireland if a poll was to be held, the secretary of state is obliged to hold that if the criteria is met.”

Under the terms of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement Mr Smith can call a vote if he believes a majority of people in the Province no longer want to remain part of the United Kingdom.

In June 2018 a High Court judge held there was no legal obligation on the secretary of state to have a defined criteria in place.

Mr McCord, an outspoken critic of loyalist paramilitaries since a UVF gang beat his son Raymond Jnr to death in 1997, is appealing that determination.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

His lawyers contended that no-one currently knows what the criteria is for convening a border poll – a position they alleged is is unlawful.

As the hearing continued Mr McCord insisted his case was about helping all communities in Northern Ireland.

“I am trying to take the orange and green sectarian politics and opinions out of a border poll,” he said outside court.

“I want to see a policy set in stone when such a referendum must be held, and not be left to the discretion of the secretary of state, or subject to the demands of either Sinn Fein or the DUP.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

His solicitor, Ciaran O’Hare, pointed to changing demographics and claimed Brexit has had a “profound” effect on attitudes to a united Ireland.

He added: “Right now, the people of Northern Ireland are being denied their constitutional right to self-determination.

“The decision of the secretary of state for Northern Ireland to maintain the status quo is unconstitutional and flies in the face of ... the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement.”