DUP MLA: Vaccine passports are cruel, disgusting, abhorrent and discrimination of the worst kind
The North Antrim MLA and former chairman of the justice committee described the law currently in force as being coercive, cruel, disgusting and abhorrent.
It has been a legally-enforceable requirement ever since December 13 that people must prove they are fully vaccinated before entering places like pubs and restaurants.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThere is are possible £10,000 fines for the most serious offenders.
Department of Health data states that it is overwhelmingly non-vaccinated people who are being hospitalised with Covid (see graph).
The Executive had agreed to back the move weeks earlier on November 17, but it is understood DUP ministers at the time opposed it.
At the time however, DUP MLA Pam Cameron came out vocally on the side of such so-called passports (which are officially known as vaccine certificates), saying: “Mine has been ready to go for some time now!
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“No one likes any of these measures... [but] I would encourage those who can take a vaccine to avail of that protection #COVIDCertNI.”
Then, when the Assembly as a whole met publicly on December 14 to ratify the measures, the vote split unionism.
Of the 36 unionists who voted that day, 24 voted against the passports (Jim Allister of the TUV plus 23 DUP MLAs, including Pam Cameron).
Meanwhile 11 unionists voted in favour (10 UUP MLAs and independent Claire Sugden).
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdToday, Mr Frew presented a largely-online petition to the Assembly, run by a group called Liberty NI.
The petition reads: “If you believe it should be your choice whether or not you receive medical treatment such as a vaccine;
“And you believe that the government should not be allowed to restrict the personal freedoms of people because of their medical status;
“Then this is your opportunity to help us tell the government that the people refuse to consent to having their personal liberties eroded or restricted based on medical status.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdMr Frew then told the chamber: “In my 12 years as an Assembly Member, this may be my first time presenting a petition.
“It has 10,000 signatures. I cannot think of a more honourable cause for a petition than to record our disgust and abhorrence that an Executive, and, indeed, the Assembly, can pass such a discriminatory measure as vaccine certification...
“[It] was brought into reality by a health minister using emergency legislation that is both undemocratic and not accountable through the vigorous and rigorous regime of stages of primary legislation.
“Vaccine certification is one of a number of cruel measures brought in by the health minister, but this one treats people differently based only on whether they have received a medical intervention, namely a Covid vaccine.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“That measure is designed to discriminate. That measure is designed to isolate. That measure is designed to coerce.”
He said that it was “discrimination... of the harshest order” and that it had led to a “terrible impact on business”.
There was no debate following his statement, although Matthew O’Toole of the SDLP raised a “point of order” calling for Mr Frew’s remarks to be “corrected” by statements from the health minister Robin Swann, and condemned “the fairly extreme, marginal campaign groups that are opposed to vaccines”.
Christopher Stalford, in the speaker’s chair, responded by telling Mr O’Toole “he will be aware that is not a point of order”.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdDUP First Minister Paul Givan had told the News Letter last Friday: “I objected at the meeting [on Thursday] to the continued use of the mandatory Covid certification scheme, as did all of the DUP ministers at the Executive.
“We were opposed to it when it was first brought in, and oppose its continued use.
“Now, ultimately, the majority of the Executive took a different view but the DUP opposed it. We want the mandatory use of covid certification to stop. That is our position.
“The justification for its continued use I don’t believe is there. It’s ultimately for the other parties to defend why they believe it should continue to be in operation.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe Executive is expected to meet again this Thursday, at which point it is expected to be discussed again.
More from this reporter:
Click here – Criminalising conversion therapy: Northern Ireland must avoid – not mimic – Canada’s new law says transgender writer
—— ———
A message from the Editor:
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.
With the coronavirus lockdowns having had a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.
Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.
Visit
https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptionsnow to sign up.
Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.
Ben Lowry, Editor