New inquest into Troubles shooting in North Belfast
The Attorney General has ordered a new inquest into the deaths of six men believed to have been killed by the Army in North Belfast during the Troubles.
James McCann, James Sloan, Anthony Campbell, Ambrose Hardy, John Loughran and Brendan Maguire were killed in the New Lodge area in 1973.
A number of them were members of the IRA.
Attorney General Brenda King wrote to victims’ group Relatives for Justice (RFJ), informing it of her decision.
Relatives of the dead believe the first two shootings were designed to provoke a response from the IRA.
Most Popular
-
1
Irish republican rebel band Wolfe Tones lead giant Belfast crowd in singing Up the Ra ‘on the same night as singing Give Peace a Chance’
-
2
Larne FC suspends player John Herron after he was spotted on camera wearing ‘tiocfaidh ar la’ assault rifle top
-
3
‘He needs to leave our club NOW!’ Strong reaction Larne FC’s John Herron being pictured in ‘tiocfaidh ar la’ gun top as club suspends him
-
4
Feile 2022: Tourism NI indicates it could pull funding for West Belfast Festival unless organisers live up to ‘responsibility to promote good relations’
-
5
Feile organisers asked if they have warned Wolfe Tones about leading young people in pro-IRA chants
RFJ casework manager Mike Ritchie said: “They claimed that all six were in the IRA but that is obviously not the case.
“Two were IRA personnel but not on active service at the time.”
He said the group had been out for a drink when they were shot dead by soldiers in an effort to provoke a battle with republicans.
The men, referred to as the New Lodge Six, were killed in two separate shooting incidents.
Their families believe soldiers were responsible for all the killings and that a one-day inquest in 1975 failed to properly examine the deaths.
Relatives for Justice said the coroner will be able to force the Police Service of Northern Ireland and Ministry of Defence to hand over documentation and ensure any surviving soldiers are required to attend and face cross-examination on their conduct.
It will also mean that vital testimony from eyewitnesses, whose statements were not heard by the original inquest, can be considered.