
But a judge warned Stephen Altimas, 37, he could be returned to custody if he posts anything on social media while criminal proceedings continue.
Altimas, of Jamaica Court in Belfast, is currently contesting allegations of harassing Ms Cahill on dates between February and March this year.
He was arrested again earlier this month over claims of using Twitter and Facebook in breach of an order banning any online activity.
Prosecutors alleged that posted links to music videos were in reference to his ex-partner.
Most Popular
-
1
Larne FC suspends player John Herron after he was spotted on camera wearing ‘tiocfaidh ar la’ assault rifle top
-
2
Feile organisers asked if they have warned Wolfe Tones about leading young people in pro-IRA chants
-
3
Irish republican rebel band Wolfe Tones lead giant Belfast crowd in singing Up the Ra ‘on the same night as singing Give Peace a Chance’
-
4
Irish language group Kneecap accused of ‘grooming sectarian hatred’ with Feile mural
-
5
‘He needs to leave our club NOW!’ Strong reaction Larne FC’s John Herron being pictured in ‘tiocfaidh ar la’ gun top as club suspends him
Madam Justice McBride was also told Ms Cahill – who hit the headlines in 2014 when she went public over entirely separate claims of being raped as a teenager and later interrogated by the paramilitary IRA – has now been subjected to online trolling by other internet users.
Defence barrister Michael Tierney stressed his client categorically denies any involvement in the postings.
He told the court Altimas went to his solicitor’s office to deactivate his social media accounts last month in a bid to comply with court orders.
Mr Tierney also contended that it was “a bit of a stretch” to interpret music videos as a reference to the alleged victim.
With the contested harassment allegations due back in court next month, the judge ruled that Altimas can be released back on bail in the meantime.
Cautioning against going online, she told him: “It seems to me that if these posts were made by you they amount to a breach of conditions imposed on you – irrespective of whether they were actually directed at Mairia Cahill or not.”