Allegations that a Northern Ireland politician was to benefit from £7 million in an offshore account linked to a controversial property deal are “100 per cent” certain, the Dail has been told.
Independent TD Mick Wallace, who two weeks ago made the claims under parliamentary privilege, has said his sources stand by them.
Late on Tuesday night, a lawyer at the centre of the affair, Ian Coulter, denied any of the money in an Isle of Man account was intended for any politician.
Responding in the Dail to Mr Coulter’s statement, Mr Wallace said: “I see Mr Coulter has come out and denied the involvement of a politician. Well he would, wouldn’t he?”
The Wexford TD added: “I decided to contact my sources this morning and ask them to what degree of certainty they could stand over the involvement of a particular politician. The reply was 100 per cent – enough.”
Mr Coulter’s former Belfast-based law firm Tughans was involved in the £1.1 billion sale of Northern Ireland assets owned by the Dublin government’s “bad bank” NAMA to US investment firm Cerberus last year.
He said: “No politician, nor any relative of any politician in Northern Ireland, was ever to receive any monies in any way as part of this deal. This was never discussed, assumed nor expected.”
NAMA is the bank set up by the Irish government to clear property loans from bailed out lenders. It and all private firms involved in the Northern Ireland assets sale have denied wrongdoing.
Mr Coulter is under investigation by the Law Society, which regulates lawyers in Northern Ireland.
He was the managing partner in Tughans law firm but resigned in January this year.
He said he received no personal financial benefit from his work on the transaction or any of the £7.5 million fees.
Money which has been called into question was part of the total legal and consultancy fees agreed as payable by Cerberus to its US lawyers, Brown Rudnick. Cerberus did not engage or pay Tughans directly.
Mr Coulter said he instructed Tughans’ finance director to transfer a “portion of the fees” to an “external account which was controlled only by me” in September 2014 and added: “The reason for the transfer is a complex, commercially- and legally-sensitive issue and has been explained to my former partners at Tughans.”
He said the concept of the deal was done by other business people in Northern Ireland, before any involvement of any bidder.
Tughans said it “strongly disagrees” with his version of events surrounding the treatment, discovery and retrieval of the fees and his exit from the practice.
“We voluntarily brought the matter to the attention of the Law Society and will continue to co-operate with any inquiry,” it said in a statement.
In fresh allegations before the Dail, Mr Wallace has claimed a NAMA official sought and accepted a €30,000 (£21,100) bribe from a construction firm for leaving the toxic assets agency.
“I know a construction company who wanted to exit out of NAMA,” he said.
“They asked the manager of the portfolio could this happen, and he said ‘yeah, but it will cost you 15,000 in cash, and I want it in a bag’.
“They delivered the money and a few weeks later he demanded the same again, they duly obliged and all was sorted.”
Mr Wallace said this was just a “small window into the workings” of NAMA and “the big loser is the taxpayer in the south”.
“Do you know how many barristers, judges, solicitors, top four accountancy firm partners and bankers are in syndicates that have been set up by Goodman Stockbrokers, Anglo Private, Bank of Ireland Private, AIB Private, Davy, Warren and Quinlan, which have transferred to NAMA, and which NAMA has not enforced, despite personal guarantees being attached?” he asked.
“NAMA is responsible for some people being tossed out of their homes, but it looks like some of the great and good of Irish society are blessed with NAMA’s good will.”
Taoiseach Enda Kenny said Mr Wallace was making very serious claims and should bring any facts to the Dail’s Public Accounts Committee, which he said was responsible for NAMA’s accountability and transparency.
The allegations drew an angry response from Speaker Sean Barrett who said the Dail can not be used as a “star chamber” for unsubstantiated claims.
NAMA said its chief executive Brendan McDonagh will write to the Garda Commissioner to ask them to investigate the claims.
“The allegation, if not investigated as a matter of urgency, casts a shadow over all Nama officers and, accordingly, we will ask that the Deputy’s allegation, including any evidence that he may claim to possess, be investigated as a matter of urgency,” a spokesman said.
He added that anyone with evidence of criminal wrongdoing is legally obliged to bring it to the attention of the Garda.
The spokesman also described as “categorically false and incorrect” claims by Mr Wallace that NAMA knew as far back as January this year about £7 million (€10 million) paid into an Isle of Man account.
“NAMA has already confirmed that the first it knew of this payment which, it is alleged, was connected to individuals in Northern Ireland, was two weeks ago following news reports on the issue,” he said.