No deal should mean return of direct rule: UUP

The prime minister must introduce direct rule in Northern Ireland immediately if the UK leaves the EU without a deal on March 29, UUP leader Robin Swann has said.

Theresa May arrived at Stormont House in Belfast today for a series of meetings with Northern Ireland’s main political parties, with Mr Swann’s party being first in the queue.

UUP leader Robin Swann (centre) and some of his party colleagues pictured entering Stormont House to meet with the Prime Minister. 'Picture by Jonathan Porter/PressEye

UUP leader Robin Swann (centre) and some of his party colleagues pictured entering Stormont House to meet with the Prime Minister. 'Picture by Jonathan Porter/PressEye

Speaking ahead of the meeting, Mr Swann said his party had a “very clear message” for the prime minister.

With just 50 days to go until the UK’s scheduled exit date from the EU, the North Antrim MLA said Mrs May will have to put direct rule government in place for Northern Ireland by March 30 if there is no extension of Article 50.

He added that the Province would need “political leadership and direction” in the event of a no-deal scenario.

“We are not far from the 29th March, we as a party don’t see a no-deal as a positive situation or something that suits Northern Ireland or the UK,” he said.

“We have asked her to look for an extension of Article 50, if she is not prepared to do that, and we are at a situation where the Executive and the Assembly isn’t up and running again, she has to put something in place.”

After his meeting, Mr Swann claimed Mrs May appeared reluctant to talk about efforts to restore power-sharing.

“The conversation we were having with the prime minister was initially about Brexit, we had to drag her to a place were we actually started to talk about how we get these institutions back up and running,” he said.

Alliance Party leader Naomi Long expressed her impatience at what she termed the lack of progress in the two years since the UK voted to leave the European Union.

She said she had a “very direct” meeting with the prime minister, adding: “This is not about political philosophy, this is about people who live in Donegal and work in Derry, this is about people who live in Newry and work in Dundalk. This is about people being able to do their jobs, it’s about workforce planning in our health service, in our schools, it’s about all of those things. It’s not about philosophical debates in Parliament.”

SDLP leader Colum Eastwood, who was third in to see Mrs May, said she needed to understand there was “no alternative” to the backstop.

“The bottom line is this – for the people of Northern Ireland, for our peace process, for all of our political progress, we need to remain within the customs union and single market in order to avoid a hard border,” he said.

“I think that will begin to be understood at all levels in the British parliament because they don’t have an alternative. They talk about vague alternatives but there aren’t any alternatives.”

Following her discussions with the PM, Sinn Fein president Mary Lou McDonald accused Mrs May of coming to Belfast with “no plan, no credibility and no honour”.

She added: “We regard the position adopted by Mrs May and her government as one of hostility to Irish interests, we have told her that Irish public and political opinion is united on the matter of protecting Ireland north and south, and we have told her that certainly we will not blink.”

Mrs May’s partners in government, the DUP, were the final party to meet the PM at Stormont House.

Speaking afterwards, DUP leader Arlene Foster reiterated her position that the backstop is the “main problem”.

She said her party has an “ongoing engagement” with the government over Brexit.

“This was another useful opportunity to press for a deal which works for the entire United Kingdom. We want a deal which respects the Union and the referendum result,” she said.

“Our message was very simple. The draft Withdrawal Agreement is flawed because the backstop would undermine the economic and constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom.

“The backstop is the main problem. It must be dealt with in the terms set out in the Brady Amendment which secured a majority in the House of Commons.

“During that debate, the prime minister made commitments that there would be legally binding changes to the Withdrawal Agreement. That is what is needed.

“It is welcome that the prime minister is travelling to Brussels to seek changes but she must stand strong and by the commitments she made.”