Chris Moncrieff: MPs are betraying will of British people

Are we witnessing the greatest parliamentary betrayal ever inflicted on the British people?

Tuesday, 19th March 2019, 7:35 am
ONE EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO SALES. NO ARCHIVING. NO ALTERING OR MANIPULATING. NO USE ON SOCIAL MEDIA UNLESS AGREED BY HOC PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICE. MANDATORY CREDIT REQUIRED: UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor Handout photo issued by the House of Commons of Chancellor Philip Hammond delivering his Budget statement to MPs in the House of Commons, London. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Monday October 29, 2018. See PA story BUDGET Main. Mandatory credit must read: UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/PA Wire NOTE TO EDITORS: This handout photo may only be used in for editorial reporting purposes for the contemporaneous illustration of events, things or the people in the image or facts mentioned in the caption. Reuse of the picture may require further permission from the copyright holder.

Forget all the complex Brexit motions and their even more complicated amendments, and the otiose language being used at Westminster, and consider instead the simple issue of the honour of parliamentarians - because it is now seriously in question.

Parliament ordered the referendum and vowed it would honour the result. To their great shame, many MPs are now betraying that pledge.

The Remainers were so cocksure of winning, that they conducted a ludicrously low-key and complacent referendum campaign. The allegations they are making now and the questions they’re asking, should have been aired during the campaign.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Furthermore, the suggestion that the referendum revealed a divided nation and should mean a second vote is just so much nonsense. All elections reveal that - and Winston Churchill, when asked what he considered a satisfactory majority, replied: “One vote.”

Let us hope the next few weeks will give the majority voters in the referendum what they asked for.

• The vultures are already menacingly circling over the silver-haired head of David Steel, former leader of the Liberal Party.

They are not exactly screeching, “Off with his head!”, but they are demanding that he be stripped, here and now, of his peerage.

You could be forgiven for assuming (wrongly) that such people might have possessed more common sense and a feeling for normal justice than to demand punishment for a man while an inquiry into his conduct is still in progress.

Steel has already been suspended from the Liberal Democrats while the inquiry continues. It relates to how much he knew about the behaviour of long-time colleague Sir Cyril Smith’s abusive behaviour towards young people in Rochdale.

There are still many unanswered questions about Smith’s murky behaviour. Why did Smith not sue when an underground newspaper in the town openly printed he accusations against him? And why did the police take no action at the time?

Meanwhile, Steel has served the party well and faithfully for years, including overseeing the tricky link-up of the dying SDP with the Liberals in the 1980s.

Give the man a chance, please, and a fair hearing.

• And yet more national newspaper exposure for the Liberal Democrats. Vince Cable, the party’s venerable leader, announced that he will relinquish the leadership in May, conditional on the state of health of Brexit at that time.

Who is likely to succeed him, given that there are no “household names” left in the party in the Commons any more?

Jo Swinson, the reasonably competent deputy leader must seem the obvious choice as Cable’s successor, especially since the Lib Dems remain the only major party in the country which has not had a female leader - people seem to forget that Margaret Beckett was briefly the fully-fledged leader of the Labour Party on John Smith’s sudden death in 1994.

Swinson has ministerial experience in the recent Conservative-Lib Dem coalition administration. She is also a lot less growly than the present incumbent who is also an unlikely suave ballroom dancer.

• A smallish man with horn-rimmed glasses gently asked an attendant if he could enter a part of the House of Commons not normally open to the public.

When he was denied entrance, he said: “I am an MP’s husband.” It still cut no ice. It was only when someone who overheard these exchanges called out, “He’s the prime minister’s husband”, that he was granted admission.

Philip May is commendably plainly a modest man. He absolutely exemplifies that wonderful line of Shakespeare’s: “There’s nothing so becomes a man as modest stillness and humility.”.

What a refreshing change compared with some of his predecessors as spouses of prime ministers.