Pastor McConnell trial: Sermon ‘grossly offensive’ to Muslims

Pastor James McConnell at Belfast's Magistrates Court
Pastor James McConnell at Belfast's Magistrates Court

An evangelical Belfast preacher was grossly offensive in making a pulpit declaration that he doesn’t trust a single Muslim, a court has heard.

Prosecutors claimed Pastor James McConnell’s “unrepentant” characterisation of an entire religion has no legal protection.

Pastor McConnell was supported in court by his wife Margaret and daughters Julie and Linda''(left) arrives at Belfast's legalised Court where his trail begins regarding comments he made about Islam in one of his church sermons.  Pastor McConnell's daughters Julie and Linda along with their mother Margaret arrive at the court. ''Picture by Jonathan Porter/PressEye

Pastor McConnell was supported in court by his wife Margaret and daughters Julie and Linda''(left) arrives at Belfast's legalised Court where his trail begins regarding comments he made about Islam in one of his church sermons. Pastor McConnell's daughters Julie and Linda along with their mother Margaret arrive at the court. ''Picture by Jonathan Porter/PressEye

The 78-year-old clergyman has gone on trial over the contents of an internet-broadcast sermon were he branded Islam “satanic” and “heathen”.

More than 100 of his supporters packed a public gallery at Belfast Magistrates’ Court for the start of the hearing.

The preacher denies improper use of a public electronic communications network, and causing a grossly offensive message to be sent by means of a public electronic communications network.

Both charges centre on comments made at his Whitewell Metropolitan Tabernacle in north Belfast in May last year.

Pastor James McConnell talks to supporters before going into Belfast Magistrates' Court

Pastor James McConnell talks to supporters before going into Belfast Magistrates' Court

He defended his views at the time but following a public outcry he later apologised for any offence or distress caused.

As the case opened defence barrister Philip Mateer QC called on the prosecution to identify the specific alleged offence.

He said: “My client should not be at the start of his trial in a state of mystification as to precisely what it is within the sermon that’s supposed to be criminal.”

Prompted by District Judge Liam McNally, prosecution counsel David Russell claimed the clergyman had made remarks aggravated by hostility.

He pointed to portions of the sermon where Pastor McConnell referred to Allah as a “heathen”, “cruel” and “demon” deity.

According to Mr Russell a minister is entitled to speak in those “trenchant terms” during the course of a service.

The defendant is protected under Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights covering freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and freedom of expression, he accepted.

Mr Russell acknowledged: “This is a man who has served his church all his life, who has a deep and honestly held faith, one he expresses and is entitled to express openly and to demonstrate those properly religious views he holds.”

He argued that the alleged offences came later on in the sermon.

When the preacher stated “Islam is heathen ... Islam is satanic ... Islam is a doctrine spawned in hell” his views are protected by Articles 9 and 10, the prosecutor said.

But those comments, he contended, formed part of the context for other remarks.

The court heard how Pastor McConnell declared: “People say there are good Muslims in Britain – that may be so – but I don’t trust them.”

Mr Russell contended those remarks were central to the case against him.

“He’s saying ‘I don’t trust a single Muslim’,” the barrister claimed.

As the allegation was made against the preacher he shouted out from a back row of Courtroom 12: “No.”

However, prosecution counsel continued: “He characterised the followers of an entire religion in a certain stereotypical way, that is grossly offensive and that is not protected by saying it from the pulpit.

“It wouldn’t be protected whether it was said about members of the Christian faith, the Jewish faith, Protestants, Catholics or members of the Muslim faith.

“That is the portion that is grossly offensive. It has nothing to do with his freedom of expression or his freedom to preach.”

Mr Russell claimed the defendant repeated his views days later in an appearance on BBC Northern Ireland’s Nolan Show.

Unlike the sermon streamed over the internet, the preacher cannot be prosecuted for remarks made on television.

But Mr Russell argued that the interview showed no change in view.

“He’s unrepentant in this,” the barrister added.

“The decision to prosecute is proportionate and necessary within the terms of the legislation.”

Amid opening legal exchanges Mr Mateer claimed his client has been charged on the basis of a limited remark.

“This prosecution is founded entirely on five words,” he suggested.

The trial continues.