Ulster Bank business moves to NatWest

The transfer of Ulster Bank’s business to parent company NatWest has been approved at the High Court in Belfast.

Wednesday, 7th April 2021, 3:53 pm
Ulster Bank

A judge gave permission after confirming all legal requirements were met and identifying no adverse impact on the few objectors.

Mr Justice McFarland confirmed today: “I will therefore sanction the transfer scheme.”

Ulster Bank made the court application in advance of the planned May 3 switchover date.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

The transfer of the Northern Ireland business to NatWest is aimed at simplifying structures.

Customers will not see any changes to everyday services, with Ulster Bank’s branding and branch network being maintained.

As part of the legal process under the Financial Services and Markets Act notices were published in UK newspapers, as well as the London, Edinburgh and Belfast Gazettes.

Ruling on the application, the judge set out Ulster Bank’s long history, from its beginnings in the early 19th Century to its current position within the NatWest Group.

Eight objections to the transfer scheme were put forward, the court heard.

Only two of those who expressed opposition are understood to be customers of Ulster Bank Ltd.

The other six were customers of Ulster Bank Ireland, a related company trading in the Republic.

One of the objections involved a customer taking legal action against Ulster Bank Ltd.

But Mr Justice McFarland pointed out that the claim will continue and could, if successful, be enforced against NatWest.

“The transfer of any potential liability pursuant to the litigation from the transferor (with gross assets of £11.2 billion and net assets of £500 million) to the transferee (with gross assets of £311 billion and net assets of £18 billion) could be seen as a positive outcome, and in no way adverse to this objector’s interests,” he said.

Publicity about the planned move and court proceedings was undertaken in accordance with the statutory requirements, the judge held.

“I am satisfied that the people impacted by the transfer - customers, employees and interested third parties - have been properly advised and in terms which are readily understandable,” he said.

Describing the formal objections as very small in number, he added: “This has to be seen in the context of a bank which has in excess of 600,000 customers.

“Despite their expressed concerns, none of the objectors will be adversely affected by the transfer scheme.