Ulsterman Harold Alexander was loved by his troops – and was a favourite of Winston Churchill

The Second World War was the most truly global war and the most costly in terms of human life in history. Estimates for the death toll range from 50 million to 85 million.

Given the global scale of the conflict, Northern Ireland’s contribution is astonishing in many areas, not least the very high proportion of British commanders who were either men of Ulster birth or of Ulster stock: Brooke, Alexander, Auchinleck, Dill and Montgomery. Almost 50 years ago Hugh Shearman observed that successive chiefs of the Imperial General Staff were ‘a major Ulster export’.

On May 4 1945, on Lüneburg Heath, Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery (later 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein) accepted the unconditional surrender of German forces in north-west Germany, Denmark and Netherlands.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Five days earlier 1945 Field Marshal Sir Harold Alexander (subsequently 1st Earl Alexander of Tunis) had received the surrender of a million Germans troops in Italy, described as ‘the most coherent enemy group of armies still resisting’, and the first big surrender of the war.

Harold Rupert Leofric George Alexander was born in London on December 10 1891 and was the third son of 4th Earl and Countess of Caledon.

At Harrow he was an all-round sportsman, excelling at cricket, athletics, rackets, rugby, boxing, fencing and gymnastics.

He also taught himself to carve in both wood and stone and began to paint which became one of the main passions of his life.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Alexander initially toyed with the notion of becoming an artist rather than a professional soldier. As this suggests, he was by no means a typical soldier, being a gifted linguist and speaking Russian, German and Urdu fluently.

He saw service in the Great War, commanded the 2nd Battalion of the Irish Guards, was wounded twice and won the MC, the DSO and the Légion d’Honneur.

In his history of the Irish Guards in the Great War Rudyard Kipling observed that, ‘it is undeniable that Colonel Alexander had the gift of handling the men on the lines to which they most readily responded ... His subordinates loved him, even when he fell upon them blisteringly for their shortcomings; and his men were all his own’.

In 1919, during the Russian Civil War, Alexander led the Baltic Landswehr, a Baltic-German unit, against the Bolsheviks.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In 1937 (at the age of 45) he became a major general, the youngest general in the British Army.

During the Second World War Alexander oversaw the final stages of the evacuation from Dunkirk where he was the last man off the beaches and demonstrated sangfroid throughout. ‘Our position is catastrophic,’ a staff officer told him. ‘I’m sorry,’ he replied. ‘I don’t understand long words.’

He subsequently held high-ranking commands in Burma, North Africa (where he gave Montgomery a free hand and allowed him to take all the credit), and Italy, including commander-in-chief Middle East and command of 18th Army Group in Tunisia. He then commanded 15th Army Group for the capture of Sicily and again in Italy before receiving his field marshal’s baton and being made supreme allied commander Mediterranean.

We have already noted one of the two great highlights of his military career: the liberation of Italy and the surrender of a million German troops in April 1945. The other was his dispatch to Churchill on May 13 1943 that ‘the Tunisian campaign is over. All enemy resistance has ceased. We are the masters of the North African shores’.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Alexander was always mindful of the widespread criticism of Great War commanders for their lack of contact with ordinary soldiers. As a result he spent more time with his forward troops than he did in his HQ. His popularity was immense. His strategic planning was informed by his acute appreciation of what war was like on the front line.

Rightly or wrongly, Brooke felt that Alexander needed an able chief of staff ‘to think for him’ but Montgomery (Alexander’s subordinate in both Africa and Italy) had the temerity to think that Alexander was ‘incompetent’ and Alexander’s success in Tunisia was only achieved because Montgomery lent him Lieutenant-General Brian Horrocks. The only person Montgomery was in awe of was Brooke.

Taking their cue very much from Brooke, Alex Danchev and Daniel Todman offer an interesting (if probably) too harsh an editorial assessment of Alexander in ‘The War Diaries of Field Marshal Lord Alanbrooke’: ‘Intellectually he was unimpressive, although whether this stemmed from genuine stupidity or an Edwardian desire not to appear too keen is open to doubt. His amiability and desire to be agreeable to all often gave the impression that he lacked grip but may have made him a suitable candidate for high command over an army which contained numerous and fractious allies. If his personality hindered victory, it prevented disintegration. It also made him an excellent lightning rod to safeguard his subordinates [such as Montgomery] from bolts of Churchillian invective.’

Harold Macmillan, who was minister resident in the Mediterranean between 1942 and 1945, rated Alexander very highly, believing that his urbane manner and willingness to discuss and compromise were a sensible way to maintain inter-Allied cooperation. Macmillan and Alexander had very similar personalities.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Americans got on extremely well with Alexander. Montgomery, by contrast, with his boundless vanity and massive ego, had an unerring capacity to antagonise them at every turn. Montgomery sorely tried General Dwight D Eisenhower’s almost infinite patience and was fortunate to avoid dismissal. General George S Patton referred to him as ‘that cocky little limey fart’ and General Omar Bradley thought he was ‘all-out, right-down-to-the-toes mad’. Alexander, on the other hand, cared nothing for praise.

Alexander was a significantly more gifted strategist than is often appreciated. He had the ability to retrieve difficult situations, as is evidenced by his command in Burma. Modest and self-deprecating, throughout his life he demonstrated that he was imperturbable, courageous and possessed a great capacity for friendship. Churchill was a friend who regarded Alexander as his favourite general. Of Montgomery on the other hand, Churchill observed, ‘In defeat unbeatable: in victory unbearable.’

Related topics: