Noah Donohoe inquest may be delayed until ‘all lines of inquiry pursued’

An inquest into the death of schoolboy Noah Donohoe may need to be delayed until “all lines of inquiry have been pursued”, his family’s legal representatives said yesterday.
Noah Donohoe and his mum FionaNoah Donohoe and his mum Fiona
Noah Donohoe and his mum Fiona

The issue was raised during a pre-inquest review hearing, when coroner Joe McCrisken said he had been written to by two English MPs encouraging him to hold the inquest earlier than its scheduled date of January 10, 2022.

In response, lawyers for Noah’s mother, Fiona Donohoe, said the January date was “ambitious” and raised concern over witnesses who have still not been identified.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Noah, a pupil at St Malachy’s College, was found dead in a storm drain in north Belfast last June, six days after he went missing.

At the pre-inquest hearing, issues around disclosure, scope of the hearing and timing were discussed.

Mr McCrisken asked Niall Murphy, solicitor for the Donohoe family: “There is one question I want to ask in terms of the commencement date of the inquest hearing on January 10 2022 – is that still suitable?

“I was written to this week by two English MPs who encouraged me to hold the inquest much more quickly than January 10.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Mr Murphy said: “I am completely unaware of who has sent that correspondence but in respect of Ms Donohoe’s expectations of the inquest it can only commence when it is ready. It is not ready and is not anywhere near.

“I am happy to place on the record my view that January 10 is somewhat ambitious but we need a date to work towards.”

Barrister for the Donohoe family, Brenda Campbell QC, added: “It is very much the focus of Noah’s family, and his mother in particular, to ensure that all lines of inquiry have been pursued, are being pursued.

“It is very much our view that this ought to be an ongoing inquiry and there are a number of lines of inquiry which we will be raising in correspondence.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“There is a desire on the part of the family to be satisfied that the PSNI investigation has been thorough. Even within the papers that we have there are references to witnesses who appear not to have been identified.”

Ms Campbell added: “I think it is our view that January 10 does appear to be optimistic, and rather than bringing the hearing forward it may well be that there is an application to push it back by two months or a little bit more, in order to accommodate all of the lines of inquiry that need to be bottomed out.”

Counsel for the coroner, Sean Doran QC, said: “I think there is always a risk if any suggestion of slippage is made, that perhaps work has a tendency to slow down.

“We are working towards ensuring that the inquest starts on the date which it is currently listed.”

Mr McCrisken said: “As far as I am concerned this inquest is starting on January 10 2022. That is the date we will be calling witnesses.”

Another pre-inquest review will be held on June 30.