Omagh bomb: Victim's father Michael Gallagher pushes ahead with legal challenge to alleged government delays in setting up new investigation

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
​A bereaved father is pressing ahead with his legal challenge to alleged government delays in establishing a new investigation into the Omagh bombing, the High Court heard today.

​Counsel for Michael Gallagher claimed nothing meaningful has happened since Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris announced plans for a statutory inquiry nearly two months ago.

​Eamon Foster said: “The applicant’s position is there has been continuing delay and we would like that addressed by way of a hearing date which may focus minds and progress the matter.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

​Mr Gallagher’s son Aiden was among 29 people killed in the August 1998 Real IRA car bomb attack on the Co Tyrone town. The victims included a woman pregnant with twins.

Michael Gallagher had taken legal action over alleged intelligence failings in the lead up to the Omagh bombMichael Gallagher had taken legal action over alleged intelligence failings in the lead up to the Omagh bomb
Michael Gallagher had taken legal action over alleged intelligence failings in the lead up to the Omagh bomb

​Previous legal action centred on claims that a range of intelligence from British security agents, MI5 and RUC officers could have been drawn together to foil the terrorist plot.

​In 2021 a High Court judge held that the bombing could arguably have been thwarted if police had received all available material.

​At that stage Lord Justice Horner recommended fresh probes on both sides of the Irish border.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

​A further challenge was mounted by Mr Gallagher over alleged delays and failures by the UK government to act on that ruling.

​Proceedings were put on hold after Mr Heaton-Harris announced on February 2 his intention to set up a statutory inquiry to examine if the Omagh bomb could have been prevented.

​But in court today Mr Foster argued further details or even a timetable have yet to be provided.

​“It’s already been two months since the announcement and there’s been no substantive developments,” he submitted.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

​Counsel for the secretary of state insisted he remains committed to establishing an inquiry as soon as possible.

​Paul McLaughlin KC outlined a number of preliminary steps still to be completed before any further public announcement can be made, including a process to select the chair for the tribunal and draw up the terms of reference.

​Predicting further progress within the next six weeks, Mr McLaughlin indicated that a location for holding the inquiry remains undetermined.

​Adjourning proceedings to next month, Lord Justice Horner urged both sides to try to agree on a hearing date.