Sister of loyalist Michael Stone victim in legal battle breakthrough

Deborah McGuinness was granted leave to seek a judicial review of the Northern Ireland Parole Commissioners blanket ban on sitting in public.

But a judge identified no unlawfulness around the actual decision taken earlier this year to release 66-year-old Stone on licence.

Mr Justice Colton’s ruling means the notorious Milltown Cemetery bomber is not in immediate danger of being sent back to jail.

He said: “The court fully understands the strongly held views of the applicant and the relatives of those who have been murdered by Mr Stone, that he is not someone who should be released into society.

“The facts are, Mr Stone has served 27 years in prison, six years on licence, and when released was three years beyond the date when he became eligible for release.”

Stone had been imprisoned for waging a sectarian murder campaign expected to keep him behind bars until 2024.

But in January the ex-UDA man was freed on parole from HMP Maghaberry.

Ms McGuinness’ brother, Thomas McErlean, was among three mourners he murdered in a grenade attack on an IRA funeral at Milltown graveyard, west Belfast in March 1988.

She mounted a legal challenge over alleged failures to provide information about parole hearings, and to allow bereaved relatives to take part in those proceedings.

Her lawyers also contended that the decision taken to release Stone was irrational, a claim resisted by his barrister Richard McConkey.

Delivering judgment yesterday, Mr Justice Colton held it was arguable that a blanket ban on public parole hearings was unnecessary.

He granted leave for Ms McGuinness to challenge the lawfulness of the Commissioners’ rules and for failing to permit her to attend.

However, the judge rejected attempts to have Stone’s parole determination overturned, stating that it would provide her with false hope.

“The Commissioners have carried out their statutory function lawfully,” he confirmed.

“The issue is whether the release decision was so outrageous that no sensible person... could have arrived at it.

“The court is satisfied it is not arguable in the context of this application that such a case can be made.”

——— ———

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdowns having had a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.

Visit

https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptionsnow to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Ben Lowry, Editor