Ben Lowry: A bridge or tunnel to Scotland tunnel is not a fantasy, but something that the kids of today might live to see
This week I heard one of the most interesting contributions so far to the debate on a fixed link to Scotland.
It was a Scottish engineer called Gareth Dennis who spoke on BBC radio’s Good Morning Ulster.
He said that such a bridge or tunnel was entirely feasible and indeed that if engineers were asked to build it, they would certainly be able to do so, including avoiding the Beaufort’s Dyke munitions dump.
Mr Dennis said that while a bridge was possible, a tunnel was better, ideally a rail one. He said the whole project would cost at least £30 billion and take 20+ years.
Mr Dennis also said such a project would hoover up too many of the UK’s engineers and would damage the delivery of other infrastructure projects.
Some Twitter trolls who dislike my politics accuse me of falling for the Boris bridge ‘fantasy’. In fact I have never thought a structure to Scotland likely.
Traffic levels are a fraction of those crossing the English Channel, which links London and Paris, both of which alone have a population larger than Northern Ireland and Scotland combined.
On a radio discussion some years ago I applauded the ambition of a tunnel to Scotland but said it would not happen for 70+ years. That timescale was met with surprise (see below a previous article on the matter).
But I have seen how long it has taken to deliver far simpler schemes. I first started taking an interest in the inadequate road links between Belfast and both Dublin and Londonderry in the 1980s. More than 30 years later, both roads are still not full expressways (ie the best, safest long distance roads, of two lanes in each direction, with no gaps in the central reservation).
The road from Cairnryan/Stranraer to the English border, the A75, is even worse and is single carriageway for almost all of its 100 miles.
Some politicians also call Boris Johnson’s bridge/tunnel ‘fantasy’. It isn’t.
It might well be an attempt to distract political attention from his Irish Sea border, but it is plausible. It just is not remotely a current priority, given modest traffic levels and immense costs.
I think of it as a 22nd century goal — a project to be delivered by 2100 perhaps?
If it is, then plenty of the younger children of today will live to see it.
• Ben Lowry (@BenLowry2) is News Letter deputy editor
• Ben Lowry in 2020: The Boris bridge to Scotland plan is a nice dream but a distant one
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.
With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.
Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptions now to sign up.
Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.