Jim Allister: If the 2018 DUP-Sinn Fein deal is revived, it will include an Irish language zealot to oversee and enforce any act

But, first, let’s recall the political purpose of Irish language legislation.

The IRA/Sinn Fein newspaper An Phoblacht set it out very clearly in its edition of 8 December 2005 under the heading “Irish is central to republican struggle”:

“We believe that in the new dispensation, a rejuvenated and determined Republican Movement can utilise the language to such an extent that it can characterise our struggle in the new millennium.”

Whether legislation promoting Irish is free standing or part of a trilogy of language legislation is largely a distraction.

What matters is the statutory content.

The starting point in the ‘agreement’ of February 2018 was that official recognition will be given to the status of the Irish language. (The precise ramifications of this must wait the fine print of the Bill, but, clearly official recognition could elevate it to parity with English.)

However, we do know official recognition of the status of Irish will be enforced through an Irish language commissioner with statutory powers to “promote and facilitate” the use of Irish throughout the public sector.

This zealot will set standards that every public body must meet in the use of Irish in the delivery of its services.

Such will bring obvious recruitment advantage to Irish speakers across the public service.

If public bodies are required to promote and deliver their services in Irish, then, clearly staff fluent in the language will be required and preferred.

The enforcer, with statutory authority, will require executive departments and all public bodies to promote and deliver services “through the medium of Irish” (para 2.3 iii).

So, take, by way of example, the Department of Infrastructure, which delivers directional signage on our roads.

Will such now be delivered through the medium of Irish?

And, if not, won’t some publicly funded legal challenge insist on such, because a right has been established to have the delivery of services through Irish.

I fear so.

The pattern of language legislation in Wales and Scotland is of a progressive tightening of the noose.

It will be no different here because the standards required to be met by public bodies will be reviewed every five years, providing fresh opportunities for escalating Sinn Fein demands.

The figleaf of an Ulster Scots Act is a nonsense.

It is not wanted or needed.

Incidentally, what is on offer is the poorest of relations because unlike the Irish language commissioner the Ulster Scots commissioner would have no powers to set standards that must be met.

With over £200m spent feting the Irish language in recent years, there is no conceivable basis on which to warrant further endless squander on Irish for the sake of paying the Sinn Fein ransom to get a failed Stormont back.

And, of course, the Stormont now on offer is a trilingual farce where every word spoken in English would be printed and translated into Irish and Ulster Scots and vice versa, even though every MLA speaks English.

What an expensive farce!

It is still right to say ‘No’ to such a deal.

• Jim Allister QC is an MLA for North Antrim and leader of Traditional Unionist Voice