Article’s affection for Colonel Gerald Smyth blocked out facts about the Listowel mutiny

I was fascinated by your recent feature on the career of Colonel Gerald Smyth whom many regard as a great Ulster war hero and servant of the king.
Letter to the editorLetter to the editor
Letter to the editor

(The article by Gordon Lucy can be read here: ‘The one-armed Irish warrior who was a determined opponent of IRA,’ July 27)

Unfortunately, the article’s presentation of events surrounding the infamous 1920 Listowel Mutiny does a disservice to your readers and to Smyth’s memory as it allows affection for the man to block out objective facts and evidence.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Gordon Lucy is certainly correct to view Constable Mee as a malcontent within the RIC and “the spokesman” for the mutinous constables in Listowel. But it is an all too common error to regard Mee as the “ringleader for his colleagues”.

In reality, his fellow constables never appointed any sort of “leader” and there is much evidence of different individuals from that group acting on their own initiative.

I was likewise disappointed to see your author following writer Kevin Myers’ ill-informed presumption that the description of the event published in the Freeman’s Journal was purely Mee’s account. Mee may have drafted the document, but it was signed by no less than 14 constables stationed in Listowel at the time.

It is also a vast overstatement to label the constables’ rendering of Smyth’s speech as “fabrication.” Exaggeration, perhaps, which was the line Smyth himself took in his later rebuttal.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Yet there are notable consistencies between Smyth’s account and that of the RIC officers who he addressed on the day.

For example, we know from Smyth’s own testimony and earlier written orders issued from his Cork office that he did give instructions for: the relaxation of police code regulations on the discharge of firearms; the shooting of any person suspected of being armed who did not instantly raise their hands when ordered; the acceptance of some risk of mistakes being made; the withholding of police names from inquests; and the requisitioning of civilian homes (preferably, but not exclusively, of Sinn Feiners) and the eviction of the occupants wherever local barracks were burnt.

The key point is that Smyth’s objective was to stamp out Sinn Fein which included the IRA (significantly, he never mentions the IRA by name, only Sinn Fein).

Tragically for him, he inherited a command in which, as your article states, certain officers “had no stomach” for his tactics.

Wesley Curry, Belfast BT10

——— ———

A message from the Editor:

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Alistair Bushe

Editor

Related topics: