It is London and Dublin who are to blame for the fall of Stormont, not unionists

A letter from Mr RG McDowell
The Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis and the Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney. London and Dublin are neglecting their role as co guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement by introducing a protocol which abolished the basis upon which the government was formedThe Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis and the Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney. London and Dublin are neglecting their role as co guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement by introducing a protocol which abolished the basis upon which the government was formed
The Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis and the Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney. London and Dublin are neglecting their role as co guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement by introducing a protocol which abolished the basis upon which the government was formed

A great deal of criticism is being directed towards those unionists who won’t currently support the power sharing executive.

In truth however it is not unionism which collapsed this executive but the two governments neglecting their role as co guarantors of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) by introducing a protocol which abolished the basis upon which the government was formed.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In actual fact the two main unionist parties delayed the collapse of this executive and prioritised the preservation of devolution in the face of the most serious assault on Northern Ireland’s position as part of the UK for 100 years.

Letter to the editorLetter to the editor
Letter to the editor

In the case of the UUP they still do prioritise devolution.

Rarely does anybody ask the question would Sinn Fein or even the SDLP be willing to implement devolution if it involved operating a trade border were it actually exists on the island of Ireland?

If the answer to that question is that they would then I think we have a solution to our crisis.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If the answer is they would not then I feel they should extend unionists the right to refuse to accept a border where none exists when they aren’t willing to accept so much as a camera on a border that actually does exist.

Unionists should refer to the protocol abolishing the GFA structures not to unionists collapsing an executive which they in fact propped up for a considerable period of time and have really been expelled from by circumstances.

Any unionist which remains in the executive after the next election will effectively be forced into a position of supporting the protocol in practice if not in principle.

It wasn’t unionism which weaponised the GFA for selfish strategic advantage, it was the Irish government and their political allies.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If the Irish government cannot even tolerate a camera on the internationally recognised Irish border then how can they reasonably attack unionists for refusing to implement a trade border within their own country.

Mr RG McDowell, Belfast BT5

——— ———

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdowns having had a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.

Visit

now to sign up.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Ben Lowry, Editor