Jim Allister: The TUV queried the security vetting for the police ombudsman Marie Anderson last year but did not get a basic answer

Last year TUV wrote to the security minister seeking clarity on whether the police ombudsman Marie Anderson was subject to developed vetting, whether that clearance remains active, and what safeguards apply to access to highly sensitive or national security-related material.

The response failed to answer those basic questions. Instead, responsibility was passed elsewhere — with the minister stating that departments determine who requires clearance, and that responsibility in this case rests with Northern Ireland departments.

Timothy Gaston subsequently raised the matter with the first and deputy first minister, and with the justice minister. Their responses provided no clarity.

The position is now clear. Despite repeated questions, no authority has confirmed as a matter of fact that the police ombudsman holds active developed vetting — only that it is said to be a condition of appointment.

That is not good enough for a role with access to sensitive policing information and material which may engage national security considerations.

Following the DUP leader’s comments in the House of Commons on Monday, I trust he will join me in calling for root and branch reform of security vetting in public sector appointments in Northern Ireland.

There must be clear accountability. The current situation — where responsibility is passed around but no answers are given — cannot continue.

Everyone agrees vetting is required — but no one will confirm it is actually in place. That simply cannot continue.

Jim Allister MP, TUV leader, Westminster