The Belfast Agreement is in some respects worse for unionism than the 1973 Sunningdale deal

A letter from Dr WB Smith:
By Dr WB Smith
Published 7th Apr 2021, 16:26 BST
Updated 7th Apr 2021, 18:23 BST
The Belfast Agreement of 1998 is worse for unionism and good government in a number of respects than the Sunningdale Agreement 25 years earlierThe Belfast Agreement of 1998 is worse for unionism and good government in a number of respects than the Sunningdale Agreement 25 years earlier
The Belfast Agreement of 1998 is worse for unionism and good government in a number of respects than the Sunningdale Agreement 25 years earlier

Ruth Dudley Edwards (‘Unionists should control agenda, not just react to it,’ March 30, see link below)makes a good case for unionists to control the agenda while resisting efforts to draw them into an unbalanced conversation about constitutional change arising from party politics in the Republic of Ireland.

But I have to take issue with her suggestion that the Belfast Agreement gave no substantial concessions to nationalists that were not in the Sunningdale agreement.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Belfast Agreement is worse for unionism and good government in a number of respects, including these:

Brian Faulkner was Ulster Unionist Party leader at the time of the Sunningdale deal, and he led the power sharing executive that followed in 1974Brian Faulkner was Ulster Unionist Party leader at the time of the Sunningdale deal, and he led the power sharing executive that followed in 1974
Brian Faulkner was Ulster Unionist Party leader at the time of the Sunningdale deal, and he led the power sharing executive that followed in 1974

• it provides for a referendum on leaving the UK, with simple majority voting

• it makes coalition government mandatory and automatic

• it does not include any authority to keep off the Stormont executive parties which are not committed in good faith to making Northern Ireland work

• parties in the assembly have to designate as unionist or nationalist, which institutionalises sectarianism and thereby creates obstacles to making NI work for all

Letter to the editorLetter to the editor
Letter to the editor
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

• those who do not designate are excluded from key decisions, including electing First Ministers, which benefits sectarian parties and is in itself discriminatory

• the review of policing (ie. terminating the RUC)

• the selected release of ‘qualifying prisoners’, undermining the rule of law

This is not a full list: for example, the creation of the Equality Commission and Human Rights Commission has tended to legitimate the nationalist narrative of oppression.

Dr WB Smith, Belfast 15

• Ruth Dudley Edwards: Unionists should take control of the agenda, not just react to it

——— ———

A message from the Editor:

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Alistair Bushe

Editor

Related topics:Unionists