Coroner raps solicitor over veteran’s attitude

A coroner has criticised an Army veteran for refusing to agree to give evidence at an inquest into a teenager who was shot dead by soldiers in west Belfast.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Leo Norney, 17, was killed in disputed circumstances in the Turf Lodge area in September 1975.

Soldiers from the Black Watch regiment said the teenager was a gunman who had opened fire on them.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This account was rejected by people in the area who said the youth was an innocent victim of an unprovoked attack.

Scales of JusticeScales of Justice
Scales of Justice

The original inquest in 1976 returned an open verdict.

A new inquest opened in November only for proceedings to be adjourned following issues raised by a late statement received by the Coroners Service. It is due to resume at the end of April.

A preliminary hearing yesterday was told that coroner Patrick McGurgan is to apply to a court for subpoenas to compel two soldiers involved in the incident – M1 and M3 – to attend the hearing.

Mr McGurgan was then involved in sharp exchanges with a barrister representing M3 over the veteran’s failure to confirm his intention to attend.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Alva Brangam QC urged the coroner to allow him to make representations to the court as part of any application to subpoena the veteran.

He also raised the possibility of the former soldier contributing to the inquest by answering written questions from the coroner.

“We’ve danced on the head of this pin for long enough,” replied Mr McGurgan.

“I am subpoenaing him to attend, Mr Brangam, and you can advise him accordingly.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

When Mr Brangam outlined his alternative proposal, the coroner replied: “Why doesn’t he just come, what about that for a proposal?”

The barrister said a letter sent to the Coroners Service outlining M3’s position had not been replied to.

Mr McGurgan responded: “Let me ask this and you give me a response – is M3 coming or not?”

Mr Brangan replied: “We do not know the answer to that.”

The coroner responded: “Why not? Just simply ask him is he coming or not?”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The barrister said “at the moment he says he’s unable to attend” but he added it was “constantly under consideration”.

Mr Brangam suggested it would save time and costs to allow him to make representations ahead of the subpoena being issued rather than having to challenge the move later.

In response, Mr McGurgan said: “What would save time is if M3 just told you that he was coming to my inquest, Mr Brangam, instead of all this dancing about.

“He’s unable to attend at present but he’s keeping it under review – what does that mean?

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“He either knows today that he’s able to come or he knows he’s not able to come. What between now and the 25th of April is going to change?”

The barrister said M3 was unable to attend because his health was “compromised”.

Fiona Doherty QC, representing the Norney family, said there was “no basis” for M3 to be excused from the inquest on medical grounds.

“M3 is an important witness, obviously, and he’s a witness that clearly you want to hear from, quite rightly,” she told the coroner.

The inquest is set to resume in Banbridge on April 25.