Flawed Covid sports fund gave cash to wealthy clubs that didn’t need it: Stormont report

Flaws in a Covid-19 hardship fund for sporting organisations saw wealthy clubs secure cash they did not need, a Stormont report has found.
Royal County Down Golf Club received the largest grant of £1.5m from the Sports Sustainability FundRoyal County Down Golf Club received the largest grant of £1.5m from the Sports Sustainability Fund
Royal County Down Golf Club received the largest grant of £1.5m from the Sports Sustainability Fund

The Assembly’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) investigation found that the Sports Sustainability Fund (SSF) did not adhere to best practice.

The Department for Communities and Sport NI were involved in rolling out the scheme, which was designed to help sporting bodies weather the loss of income caused by the pandemic.

It paid out £23 million in grants.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The PAC report comes after the NI Audit Office last year raised concerns about how the fund was administered.

Auditors criticised the failure to take applicants’ bank balances and reserves into account when allocating money.

Auditor General Kieran Donnelly’s report last June highlighted how the largest grant of £1.5 million was paid to Royal County Down Golf Club, which had a “very significant bank balance and a high level of reserves”.

The SSF was one of a number of schemes delivered by Stormont departments to help various sectors deal with the financial implications of the pandemic.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Of the £23 million allocated, £5.1 million was distributed across 22 sport governing bodies, including £1.5 million to Ulster GAA, £1.7 million to the IFA, £1.5 million to the IRFU and £400,000 to 19 other sporting governing bodies.

Some £17.9 million was distributed across 430 sports clubs.

The grant awards were calculated by comparing the income and expenditure for the Covid-19 year with the average income and expenditure for the previous three years.

However, there was no requirement in the scheme to consider the reserves or bank balances held by applicants and whether the losses incurred by the organisations would lead to the imminent risk of closure.

The PAC has made 10 recommendations aimed at preventing a repeat of the errors.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Chairman of the committee William Humphrey said: “As a committee, we were surprised that the department and Sport NI appeared to hand out monies to organisations that could have survived without funding or with much less funding.”

The PAC report found that, due to the need to devise the scheme quickly, several flaws went unchallenged.

It said the scheme allowed organisations to quantify their losses during Covid-19 without significant investigation or challenge.

“We found that the objectives of the SSF, to ensure that organisations across a range of sports would survive, were certainly admirable,” Mr Humphrey said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“However, the department and Sport NI did not devise a set of assessment criteria that they could apply to the applications they received.

“This flawed approach meant that some large and very profitable organisations, such as golf clubs, were awarded monies that might have been better spent on smaller, more financially precarious groups.”

He added: “We were surprised that the department and Sport NI believed that it was acceptable and value for money to award public funds to clubs and organisations that ensured they achieved the same profit as they had in previous years.

“In a year where many organisations were struggling financially, providing taxpayers’ money to support the profits of sports clubs is something that should not have happened.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“What is even more concerning is that neither the department nor Sport NI appeared to realise that this underwriting of profit would be the result of the way in which the scheme was designed.

“In our evidence session, large grants to financially secure golf clubs were justified by helping to maintain the region’s position as a world number one golf destination.

“We were alarmed at this interpretation of the scheme, since it was not designed as a tourism support scheme but rather a scheme to enable sporting organisations to weather the pandemic.

“The committee understands that the SSF was developed quickly in response to the problems created by the pandemic and the scheme, as instituted, had significant flaws.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We believe that it is crucial that all government departments learn from this and, if such programme is required in the future, that more attention is paid to ensuring a fairer distribution of funds.”