Rwanda Bill: EU rights in Northern Ireland under the Windsor Framework will be debated as rival amendments to Sunak's immigration policy are lodged
MPs from the European Research Group (ERG) want the Rwanda bill to override “any other provision or rule of domestic law”. Under the Windsor Framework deal, certain EU rights are maintained in Northern Ireland under domestic legislation.
Concerns have been raised by some unionist politicians that the Rwanda Bill as it currently stands could result in a ‘people border’ between Northern Ireland and Great Britain. This is because the framework keeps the Charter for Fundamental Rights and other EU legislation applicable in Northern Ireland – arguably making the bill weaker in the province – and more attractive to people seeking asylum in the UK.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe European Union has previously told the News Letter that it expects the United Kingdom to fully honour its commitment to EU rights in Northern Ireland.
Labour MP Stella Creasy has tabled an amendment to guarantee that the Rwanda bill is “compatible with Section 7A of the European Withdrawal Act and the UK’s obligations to citizens under the Good Friday Agreement”.
Anti-protocol campaigner Jamie Bryson, speaking on behalf of Unionist Voice Policy Studies , welcomed the ERG amendment. He said: “By making every other provision of domestic and common law subject to (and thus to be subjugated by in so far as there is any inconsistency) the Rwanda Bill, and Illegal Migration Act, this means that the supremacy of section 7A of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act and thus the Protocol would be stripped out.
“This amendment would prevent reliance on the so called additional ‘rights’ conferred on NI which don’t apply in GB, due to the Protocol, and ensure NI is on the same footing as to immigration and asylum law as the rest of the United Kingdom.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“It is undoubtedly a full frontal attack on the Protocol by the backdoor, but it’s very welcome and it’s a key test for the Government as to whether they are willing to face down the pernicious and constitutionally corrosive effect of the Protocol, or not.
“This amendment has significant support, and the Government would be well advised to accept and support it.”
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.