‘The wrong time’ for spending on Irish street signs in Belfast: DUP

Promoting a policy that will lead to increased public spending on Irish language street signs is “insensitive” at a time of Covid-related financial hardship for many ratepayers, a Belfast DUP councillor has said.
A street sign in English and IrishA street sign in English and Irish
A street sign in English and Irish

Following a decision taken yesterday by a city council committee – that only 15% of residents will be required to consent to the provision of a second street sign in Irish – Councillor Tom Haire said the inevitable increased expenditure was hard to justify at this time.

At the meeting of the Strategic Policy and Resources Committee on Friday, it was decided to replace the existing stipulation – that one third of residents must petition for an Irish sign for a consultation process to begin, with two thirds then responding positively for the erection of a new sign.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“This is certainly not vital expenditure at the minute,” Cllr Haire said.

“It is not necessary, especially in these times when people are out of work because of the Covid pandemic. It is insensitive to bring it forward at this time...but it has been dragging on for years and I suppose it had to come to head at some point. But maybe this is the wrong time to discuss this issue.”

The proposal put forward by the committee yesterday is expected to be ratified when it comes up for debate by the full council.

The decision has been welcomed by Sinn Féin councillor Seanna Walsh, who said the new arrangements would “relax the stringent bilingual street signage policy” being operated by the council.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“This policy would be in line with the objectives set out in the European Charter for Regional and Minority Languages and subsequent minority language agreements to protect and grow the Irish language,” he said.

Belfast now has one of the most vibrant and energetic Irish speaking communities in Ireland.

“It is a matter of great pride that our city is quickly emerging as the epicentre of a resurgent Irish language,” Cllr Walsh added.

Carl Whyte of the SDLP described the proposal as a “very small step” towards recognising the “language and identity” of the city’s Irish language speakers.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“You’d think from some of the commentary over the last 24 hours that this is some kind of budget busting decision.

“That couldn’t be further from the truth and those pushing the figure of £4 million are deliberately trying to provoke a negative reaction because they know the end figure won’t be anywhere near as expensive,” Cllr Whyte said.

He added: “It’s about providing recognition and respect to Irish language speakers, regardless of their background. That should have been something we could find common ground on.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Alistair Bushe

Editor

Related topics: