Victoria Square apartments row: The lack of candour from the construction firms removes long established confidence in their brands, MP says

The “lack of candour” from construction firms behind the troubled Victoria Square apartments in Belfast removes the long established confidence in their highly regarded brands, the MP for east Belfast has said.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Owners of 91 luxury apartments in the Victoria Square complex in Belfast were told to evacuate in 2019 due to concerns about the integrity of a key support column.

The owners have not been able to sell or rent the properties or live in them since that, but are still paying insurance, rates, maintenance and in some cases mortgages on the properties.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

This week the High Court ruled that it could not entertain a claim for compensation against the builders, Farrans Construction and Gilbert & Ash, as the legislation in Northern Ireland places a six year legal limit on any such claims, which has now been passed.

Warnings at the defective apartments at Victoria Square in Belfast City Centre. Owners had to leave the building in 2019 due to structural failings and have recently had their bid for compensation struck out of court. Photo by Jonathan Porter/Press Eye.Warnings at the defective apartments at Victoria Square in Belfast City Centre. Owners had to leave the building in 2019 due to structural failings and have recently had their bid for compensation struck out of court. Photo by Jonathan Porter/Press Eye.
Warnings at the defective apartments at Victoria Square in Belfast City Centre. Owners had to leave the building in 2019 due to structural failings and have recently had their bid for compensation struck out of court. Photo by Jonathan Porter/Press Eye.

The apartment owners were seeking compensation of around £25m. However construction firms Farrans Construction, which operates through the UK and Ireland, and international firm Gilbert-Ash, vehemently denied any liability and applied to have the claim struck out as it had passed the time limit. As a result, no discussion of the cause of the flaw in the column was discussed in court.

The News Letter contacted the construction firms repeatedly on Friday and asked if they had ever offered any sort of explanation for the flaw to the distressed residents.

Gilbert-Ash did not respond to any inquiries while Farrans declined to comment.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

East Belfast MP Gavin Robinson, a barrister, has met with the apartment owners and spoke this week of the "intrinsic unfairness" they are suffering.

He said the reputation of the construction firms has undoubtedly been damaged by how they had acted.

"Their lack of candour does not instil confidence and they have been reputable and trusted firms, firms that have built up a reputation for good quality construction that customers can have confidence in," he told the News Letter.

"But the lack of candour on this occasion, removes that confidence. There is much more they could be doing, in my opinion, to satisfy the concerns and provide solutions for the owners of the Victoria Square apartments, and they should get on and do it.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He noted that following the Grenfell tower disaster in England, parliament passed the Building Safety Act which extended the limitation period to 30 years for compensation. He noted that Communities Minister Gordon Lyons is now looking at passing similar legislation, retrospectively. The MP added that it was "patently untrue" that this was not possible.

On Wednesday senior citizen Patrick McKeague told the News Letter that he stands to lose both his home and life savings as a result of the situation.

He put his life savings into his apartment, which cost him around £225,000 in 2011.

"I really enjoyed living in the centre of Belfast. It was a lovely apartment,” he said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"So to get the news in 2019 that the supporting column was defective was really quite a shock."

Patrick has been paying £320 service charges every quarter ever since, which covers formal monitoring of the supporting column.

As to whether he has lost his full £225,000, he says the answer to that question is "unknowable" at this time.

He is currently living in accomodation provided by his family.