Belfast ranks near the bottom for construction workers in the UK, facing limited opportunities despite decent pay

For construction workers, the choice of city can be just as important as the choice of project. Long hours on site, early mornings, and physically demanding work are par for the course, but where you live can make a huge difference to your pay, the number of jobs available, and the opportunities to grow your career.

A city with a thriving construction market doesn’t just offer work, it can offer stability, the chance to move up, and a sustainable wage that keeps up with everyday costs.

Belfast ranks near the bottom for construction workers in the UK, facing limited opportunities despite decent payplaceholder image
Belfast ranks near the bottom for construction workers in the UK, facing limited opportunities despite decent pay

New research from Premier Timber Frame Builders, using data from Indeed, CV‑Library, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), and Numbeo, reveals that Westminster stands out as the UK’s top city for construction workers, outperforming other major cities across multiple key measures. The study examined average construction labourer salaries, the number of jobs per 10,000 residents, salary-to-cost-of-living ratios, new building permits, and the density of construction businesses. Each factor was carefully weighted to give a clear picture of where construction workers are most likely to succeed.

Belfast ranks 57th overall in the UK for construction workers. Belfast offers a monthly construction salary of £2,265, which is in line with the national average, but job availability is low at just 6.29 positions per 10,000 residents, ranking 55th. Its salary-to-cost-of-living ratio is 3.04, indicating that wages stretch reasonably far relative to living costs. However, the local construction market is limited, with only 14.34 construction businesses per 10,000 residents, restricting choice and flexibility, and new building permit activity is modest. This combination of low job availability and limited business density keeps Belfast near the bottom of the rankings.

Other cities, such as Durham, Bradford, and Stoke-on-Trent, face similar challenges, with fewer roles, limited employers, and modest development activity making it difficult for construction workers to secure stable, long-term employment. In contrast, cities like Westminster, Canterbury, and Winchester offer abundant jobs, strong business density, and ongoing projects, creating both opportunity and stability for skilled tradespeople.

Omar Stoltzfus, a spokesperson for Premier Timber Frame Builders, commented on the study's findings:

“Construction workers look for three main things when choosing where to base themselves: steady work, fair pay, and signs that projects are not about to dry up. It’s not just about the headline wage. If there are plenty of firms operating locally and a strong flow of new permits, that usually means ongoing contracts and less time between jobs. Job availability per 10,000 residents tells you how competitive a market really is. A higher figure often means workers can move between employers more easily, negotiate better rates, and specialise in certain types of projects. Business density matters as well, because a healthy mix of contractors, developers and subcontractors creates resilience.”

“The salary-to-cost-of-living ratio is also important. A high monthly wage can lose its appeal if rent and daily expenses eat most of it. Workers are increasingly weighing up how far their earnings stretch, especially when travelling or relocating for work. There are advantages in the sector right now. Skills shortages in certain trades have strengthened bargaining power for experienced workers, and large regeneration and housing schemes across the country are creating varied opportunities. At the same time, challenges remain. Work can still be cyclical, and in areas with limited new permits, competition for contracts becomes tighter. Looking at pay alongside development activity gives a clearer picture of long-term prospects.”

List of the UK’s top cities for construction workers:

Rank City Avg. Construction Labourer Salary (Monthly) Construction Job Availability (per 10,000 people) Salary-to-Cost-of-Living Ratio New Building Permits (per 10,000 residents) Construction Business Density (per 10,000 residents) Total Score
1 Westminster 2,223 73.14 0.84 10 152.61 60.18
2 Canterbury 3,442 9.58 3.00 640 55.87 49.41
3 Winchester 2,282 8.60 1.68 1,310 71.93 39.13
4 Oxford 2,525 23.75 1.52 600 20.63 38.62
5 Chester 2,424 19.29 1.81 580 45.32 37.60
6 Manchester 2,510 35.46 2.04 420 34.46 37.36
7 London 2,631 4.27 1.24 20160 63.15 37.20
8 Cambridge 2,456 22.81 1.49 460 24.19 36.57
9 Lichfield 2,788 10.29 2.86 310 70.63 35.89
10 Chichester 2,494 9.64 2.03 490 74.70 35.12
11 Bristol 2,487 15.92 1.41 690 45.85 35.09
12 Southend on Sea 2,606 8.86 1.81 250 64.23 34.58
13 Exeter 2,459 12.37 2.03 500 49.11 33.06
14 Edinburgh 2,374 17.09 1.75 1,890 31.81 32.47
15 Chelmsford 2,468 9.90 1.96 180 83.61 32.31
16 Milton Keynes 2,458 8.67 2.00 970 49.97 31.37
17 Liverpool 2,952 15.89 3.78 160 36.53 30.64
18 Glasgow 2,655 13.38 2.24 #N/A 31.49 30.59
19 Norwich 2,690 15.37 2.61 40 32.49 30.45
20 Coventry 2,506 13.69 2.64 1,430 34.37 30.39
21 Newcastle upon Tyne 2,377 23.13 2.42 830 31.18 30.14
22 St Albans 2,319 8.08 1.34 140 64.94 30.01
23 Birmingham 2,823 8.58 2.84 480 32.95 29.97
24 Bath 2,412 7.28 1.54 120 60.29 29.93
25 Gloucester 2,464 18.11 2.66 270 49.06 29.71
26 Wolverhampton 2,897 10.61 3.70 90 42.05 28.47
27 Leeds 2,399 10.88 2.18 1,940 46.48 28.46
28 Southampton 2,482 12.54 2.17 10 45.29 28.01
29 Portsmouth 2,342 11.12 1.84 50 62.38 27.91
30 York 2,426 12.89 2.19 160 46.36 27.79
31 Brighton and Hove 2,211 10.50 1.28 150 55.19 27.52
32 Cardiff 2,329 17.25 2.27 410 37.41 26.42
33 Peterborough 2,423 9.25 2.70 640 44.85 26.18
34 Salford 2,214 15.51 2.10 360 47.45 25.24
35 Colchester 2,205 10.91 2.11 240 68.35 25.11
36 Leicester 2,531 11.48 2.75 190 28.14 24.75
37 Swansea 2,695 8.41 3.61 230 42.47 24.48
38 Sheffield 2,558 10.82 3.03 280 37.61 24.44
39 Lincoln 2,340 16.62 2.84 110 43.99 23.94
40 Newport 2,533 9.39 3.31 360 34.13 23.64
41 Wrexham 2,790 7.03 4.03 #N/A 51.44 23.58
42 Stirling 2,402 9.63 2.84 #N/A 52.94 22.35
43 Wakefield 2,515 4.80 3.39 610 46.64 21.64
44 Preston 2,548 12.87 3.78 #N/A 51.49 21.63
45 Plymouth 2,258 10.20 2.51 70 45.15 20.72
46 Worcester 2,085 16.41 2.43 180 37.64 20.61
47 Aberdeen City 2,329 14.07 2.87 #N/A 29.02 20.09
48 Kingston upon Hull 2,743 10.51 4.63 130 37.34 19.91
49 Lancaster 2,392 9.14 3.40 120 45.01 19.25
50 Nottingham 2,079 16.58 2.27 110 30.66 19.15
51 Dundee City 2,187 15.57 2.69 #N/A 34.87 18.94
52 Doncaster 2,434 5.83 3.96 780 51.51 18.58
53 Derby 2,140 9.96 2.84 630 36.00 18.04
54 Perth 2,248 6.50 3.05 #N/A 57.22 17.10
55 Sunderland 2,311 8.75 3.73 700 32.82 16.57
56 Stoke on Trent 2,395 8.14 3.97 140 35.27 14.79
57 Belfast 2,265 6.29 3.04 550 14.34 14.72
58 Bradford 2,218 6.58 3.27 290 36.84 14.15
59 Durham 2,111 2.69 3.80 1,270 45.27 10.55
News you can trust since 1737
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice