Lord Empey: The DUP has not faced up to its central role in creating the Northern Ireland Protocol

In a radio interview on Monday the DUP First Minister Paul Givan repeated the DUP’s threat to collapse the institutions if unionist concerns over the Northern Ireland Protocol are not addressed.
On October 1 2019, Boris Johnson was being cheered at a DUP reception at the Tory conference, above. A few hours later he proposed a border in the Irish Sea. The DUP described it as a serious and sensible way forward. This led on to his NI Protocol plan of October 17On October 1 2019, Boris Johnson was being cheered at a DUP reception at the Tory conference, above. A few hours later he proposed a border in the Irish Sea. The DUP described it as a serious and sensible way forward. This led on to his NI Protocol plan of October 17
On October 1 2019, Boris Johnson was being cheered at a DUP reception at the Tory conference, above. A few hours later he proposed a border in the Irish Sea. The DUP described it as a serious and sensible way forward. This led on to his NI Protocol plan of October 17

(‘Northern Ireland Protocol: Inevitable Stormont will collapse if issues not resolved says Givan,’ January 4, see link below)

Givan demonstrated clearly that the DUP still hasn’t faced up to the reality of their own actions in bringing the protocol into existence.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It is undeniable and obvious that there are profound concerns amongst unionists about the protocol. From the moment Boris Johnson proposed a border in the Irish Sea, which he did on October 2 2019, the Ulster Unionist Party pointed out the dangers and issued 35 statements in the period up to October 17 when the present protocol was agreed with the EU.

Lord Empey is an Ulster Unionist Party peer and former leader of the partyLord Empey is an Ulster Unionist Party peer and former leader of the party
Lord Empey is an Ulster Unionist Party peer and former leader of the party

But what Paul Givan fails to do in his comments is to recognise the role played by him and his Westminster colleagues in the period between October 2 and 17. He seems to fail to notice or acknowledge the elephant in the room, which was his party’s response to Boris Johnson’s proposals to Brussels. What was that response? It was to describe Boris Johnson’s proposal for a border in the Irish Sea as ‘a serious and sensible way forward’!

Never forget that only a few hours before Boris proposed the border in the Irish Sea, he was being cheered by senior DUP members at a reception at the Tory conference.

I think Paul needs to reflect on this and realise that his party — which at that stage was propping up Johnson’s government at Westminster — failed to withdraw that support and defend the Union which was severely damaged by what has now become the protocol.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Given that the DUP agreed a document which stated that all goods coming from Great Britain to Northern Ireland would have to be notified to the authorities in advance before entering Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK, it seems to me that they need to own up to their misjudgements before trying, yet again, to plunge Northern Ireland into a crisis which is part of their own making.

All this proves that the DUP, as enthusiastic Brexiteers, didn’t think things through, didn’t take account of the multiple warnings that were flagged up at the time and didn’t succeed in securing the Union, but have presided over its weakening.

• Lord Empey is an Ulster Unionist Party peer

——— ———

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

With the coronavirus lockdowns having had a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.

Visit

now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Ben Lowry, Editor