The anticipated move by the Agriculture Minister has been branded a stunt by other parties on the Executive, which insist Mr Poots does not have the authority to prevent checks required under the terms of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, an international treaty.
Sinn Fein deputy First Minister Michelle O’Neill, who claimed the proposal would expose the DUP to “public ridicule”, said civil servants would be obliged to defy any order from Mr Poots, as such a direction would be unlawful.
However, Mr Givan offered a very different interpretation, claiming Mr Poots no longer has legal cover to continue the agri-food checks, which are currently being conducted by his department’s staff.
He said civil servants will be legally obliged to follow a direction from the minister.
The dispute centres on whether Mr Poots requires the authority of the wider Stormont Executive to conduct the checks and inspections on goods arriving from Great Britain necessitated by Brexit’s Northern Ireland Protocol.
Claiming recent court rulings have clarified that such authority is required, Mr Poots tried to secure the approval of the Executive by asking for it to be voted on at Thursday’s meeting.
He did so in the knowledge that if the matter was elevated to the Executive, his party could at that point exercise a veto to block approval for the checks.
Realising that, Sinn Fein used its own veto to prevent the issue from even getting on the agenda in the first place.
Mr Poots now contends that in the absence of wider Executive backing, he does not have the legal authority to continue the checks.
It is unclear when he will formally announce that he has directed a halt to them.
Mr Givan told reporters at Stormont that his colleague will act.
“I think that’s a mistake on the part of Sinn Fein not to have allowed it into the Executive because for those checks to continue requires the Executive to agree that – that’s why we believe that the checks continuing would be unlawful,” he said.
“That requires Edwin Poots as the minister to act in a way that will resolve that issue and Edwin Poots is going to act.
“The fact that it’s not on the agenda does not change the legal parameters by which Edwin Poots as a minister has to discharge his duties and he will be taking action.
“That is something that the DUP have said that we were going to do, and we are going to do that.”
He said civil servants would be obliged to follow any instruction from the minister.
“It’s politicians who are elected, they have a democratic mandate, civil servants do not have a democratic mandate to take these decisions and, absolutely, civil servants will have to follow the democratic ministerial instruction of their minister,” he said.
“Not to do that, I think, would have profound implications in terms of how the civil service operates.”
Sinn Fein has argued that the Executive already took a decision in 2020 that Mr Poots’s Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera) would assume legal responsibility for carrying out the checks.
The party has now pointed to a response Mr Poots gave to an SDLP MLA later in 2020 which, it claims, confirms that position.
In September 2020, ahead of the checks coming into effect, SDLP MLA Patsy McGlone asked Mr Poots what legal advice he had sought in the event he fails to make the preparations required by the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement to carry out the checks.
In his reply, Mr Poots said his department had responsibility for carrying out agri-food safety checks and was required by UK domestic law to comply with that duty.
Ms O’Neill dismissed the DUP claims on Thursday. She characterised it as electioneering ahead of May’s scheduled Assembly poll.
“Edwin Poots himself has clearly said in the Assembly chamber that he has a legal responsibility in which to administer the checks at the ports, that remains the case today,” she said.
“There’s also very clear Executive policy that it is the Daera department, his department, that must administer those checks. So he is the minister responsible.
“Instead of electioneering and stunt politics, he should get on with doing his job.
“That’s why I have made that point very clear to him. This is all about the election, folks, this is what the DUP are at, it’s more stunts in a long list of stunts over the past number of months on this issue.”
Ms O’Neill said the Executive has very clear legal advice from the attorney general on the issue.
She said civil servants have to comply with the department’s legal obligations under the withdrawal treaty regardless of what Mr Poots directs.
“He has a responsibility, and the (Daera) permanent secretary has responsibility, regardless of what the minister says, that they have to deliver upon the checks because that is an international agreement,” she said.
If checks were to stop, it would put the UK Government at odds with its obligations under the terms of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement.
In such circumstances, the Government could use its authority to direct that the checks resume.
However, that could place it in an uncomfortable position politically, given Foreign Secretary Liz Truss is currently involved in intensive negotiations with Brussels in a bid to significantly reduce the number of checks required under the protocol.
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this story on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.
With the coronavirus lockdowns having had a major impact on many of our advertisers — and consequently the revenue we receive — we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.
Subscribe to newsletter.co.uk and enjoy unlimited access to the best Northern Ireland and UK news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.
Visit https://www.newsletter.co.uk/subscriptionsnow to sign up.
Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.
Ben Lowry, Editor