Henry McDonald: Will Boris Johnson deliver beyond his rhetoric?


In a barbed reference to parties who were mocking the threat of decisive DUP action over the Protocol only a few months ago, Sir Jeffrey noted these same parties are now “feigning surprise and outrage at a political party keeping its promise to the electorate”.
Regardless of the rights or wrongs of the DUP’s move on Friday afternoon in the Assembly, it is fair to say that at least they fulfilled a core manifesto commitment to their electorate in promising not to go back into an Executive unless there was a radical overhaul of the Protocol. For a party often accused by its unionist rivals of zig-zagging around the political landscape and doing more U-turns than an Olympic gymnast, the DUP can point to this election and its aftermath and claim they were consistent, faithful, true to their core promise.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAnother political figure who is regularly taunted for making more twists and turns than a circus contortionist is Boris Johnson, who is scheduled to arrive in Belfast this coming Monday.
For unionists, his most notorious U-turn was the Protocol itself which he bulldozed through in order to get a hard Brexit but in doing so betrayed his former DUP allies.
The chatter over a unilateral UK move to make significant changes to the post-Brexit trade deal with the EU is reaching fever pitch.
The question is will the Prime Minister, like the DUP and their ‘Protocol or powersharing pledge’, deliver beyond the rhetoric and ring in the Protocol changes?
• Other commentary:
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad• Ben Lowry May 14: Here are six of the broad reasons for the recent turn against unionism, some of which are reversible
• Editorial May 14: Crowds of all ages flock to Balmoral to savour a normal show
• Nigel Dodds May 13: Reg Empey is attacking other unionists when voters want a united approach
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad• Samuel Morrison May 13: The TUV got 8% of the vote in Northern Ireland and can no longer be ignored
• Editorial May 13: The NIO has been right to send a minister to US amid American pressure on UK
• Lord Empey May 12: The DUP have no-one to blame but themselves for disastrous election
• Editorial May 12: Any elaborate legacy system is likely to turn against the state
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad• Peter Robinson May 11: Ignore those who are urging DUP to just go back into Stormont
• John Cushnahan May 11: SF hypocrisy to attack DUP leader over MP seat while boycotting Westminster
• Ruth Dudley Edwards May 10: The nationalist vote is nowhere near enough for border poll
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad• Editorial May 10: If Irish language gets pledge today so must an overhaul of protocol
• Ben Lowry May 9: The TUV vote surge should have been one of the main stories of the election
• Owen Polley May 9: Unionists have an issue with sectarian SF, not with nationalism
• Henry McDonald May 9: A few facts are in order amid breathless reportage about SF
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad• Emma Little Pengelly May 9: There has been no increase in the nationalist vote in 25 years
• Editorial May 9: It is clear that unionists need to have option of voting for a liberal party
• Ben Lowry May 7: Unionism now faces a considerable challenge in how to go forward
• Henry McDonald May 7: Sinn Fein’s day in the sun but no new dawn for Irish unity
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad• Editorial May 7: Unionism more than ever needs London’s help on the protocol
• Ben Lowry May 7: Unionist overall vote stays ahead of nationalist total, albeit narrowly
• Brian John Spencer: Unionism was given no wriggle room by nationalism