Letter: Sinn Fein cry 'British austerity' at every turn, but they can turn on spending taps to their suit own political priorities
A letter from William Mitchell:
Sinn Féin once pushed Northern Ireland to the brink of financial crisis over welfare reform. Their refusal to implement UK-wide changes created what the Treasury described as a £600 million “black hole”, the cost of paying out more generous benefits here than anywhere else in the United Kingdom.


That shortfall didn’t disappear; it came from the block grant, money that could have funded hospitals, schools, or police. Sinn Féin’s decision was political to defy London and spend hundreds of millions on welfare top-ups while other essential services suffered.
Now, the same party is on another spending spree. Finance Minister John O’Dowd has announced 200 new civil service jobs in the North West, at a cost of at least £26 million over five years. This from the very department that ran the Civil Service Exit Scheme, which claimed to save £88 million in its first year by cutting thousands of posts and “modernising” administration.
Those who left were told it was about fiscal discipline. Yet suddenly, the purse strings are loose for a politically convenient recruitment drive. Two hundred new posts at £26,000 each amount to £5.2 million a year, before pensions, increments, and office overheads are even counted.
Meanwhile, police officers and teachers are told there’s “no money” to pay their long-promised wage awards. The PSNI remains understaffed, hospitals are at breaking point, and schools are cutting basic services.
This isn’t about so-called British austerity it’s about Sinn Féin’s political priorities.
They cry “British austerity” at every turn, but when it suits them, they can spend, spend, spend, not with their money, but ours. They treat the UK block grant as an endless handout to bankroll headline schemes and pet projects, without regard for where the money comes from or who pays the price.
If this were genuine regional development, there’d be a published cost-benefit analysis, transparent figures, and balanced investment across Northern Ireland.
Instead, it’s regional favouritism dressed up as economic renewal for a pre-election headline rather than sound policy.
William Mitchell, Lisburn